Ryanair minaccia di chiudere la base di Marsiglia


Cesare.Caldi

Veterano del Forum
Utente Registrato
14 Novembre 2005
37,264
1,441
161
N/D
Ryanair Rejects False Claims About Its Marseille Operations

ALL RYANAIR CREW PAY TAX, SOCIAL INSURANCE AND
PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS AS REQUIRED BY EU LAW

RYANAIR NOTIFIES CREWS IT WILL CLOSE MARSEILLE BASE IN NOVEMBER IF CHALLENGED BY AIX-EN-PROVENCE PROSECUTOR

UP TO 1M PASSENGERS AND 1,000 JOBS WILL BE LOST AT MARSEILLE

Ryanair, the world’s favourite airline, today (20 May) rejected the false claims made recently about Ryanair’s contracts, employees and their tax arrangements at its Marseille base. Ryanair condemned the false and misleading article in Le Figaro (2nd May) which followed their journalist’s refusal to put his queries to Ryanair in advance, and then his failure to accurately report Ryanair’s response which confirmed that “all Ryanair employment contracts comply with EU laws”.

Ryanair has invested over €300m in its Marseille base since 2006 comprising four new B737 aircraft – all of them Irish registered (and therefore Irish territory) – over 120 pilots and cabin crew operating a network of 26 mainly international flights. Since the launch of the base in 2006, Ryanair’s traffic at Marseille has risen from 200,000 to over 1.7m in 2010, with Ryanair bringing almost 1m inbound visitors annually to Marseille (and Aix-en-Provence), sustaining over 1,500 local jobs in and around Marseille Airport.

Ryanair corrected a number of false claims in the Le Figaro (2nd May) article (which was the basis for many subsequent false reports of this issue) as follows:

The activities of Ryanair’s 120 employees take place on Irish territory (Irish aircraft) and not “in France” under the EU Transport Workers Regulations.
All Ryanair’s people operating Irish registered aircraft from Marseille are employed under Irish contracts, are paid in Ireland, and pay full labour taxes, social security and their pension obligations in Ireland, where they are paid.
Since average pay in Ryanair is higher than it is in Air France, and since these people comply with EU laws by paying Irish tax and Irish social security arising from their work in Irish territory, there is no truth to the allegations of “clandestine work” or “illegal labour” or “social dumping” as falsely claimed in the Le Figaro article.
The claim that this structure results in “considerable savings” is clearly untrue, since the average pay in Ryanair is higher than the average pay in Air France.

Ryanair is currently taking an action in the European Court of Human Rights against France to challenge a 2007 decree which attempts to impose unfair and restrictive legislation on international transport companies in France. This French decree which was introduced after Ryanair’s Marseille base was announced in May 2006 is contrary to the EU principles of free movement of labour within the EU. Ryanair’s Marseille operation fully complies with all EU laws and regulations relating to transport employees and employment contracts. Ryanair’s policy of issuing Irish contracts to crew operating on Irish aircraft has already been upheld by the courts in Belgium, Germany and Spain which found that crews who operate on Irish registered aircraft are correctly employed in Ireland in accordance with EU law.

Ryanair has cooperated fully with recent enquiries from the Aix-en-Provence Prosecutor’s Office and has demonstrated that it fully complies with EU Transport Workers Regulations. Ryanair today announced that if the Aix-en-Provence Prosecutor’s Office launches Court proceedings challenging Ryanair’s employment or contractual arrangements at Marseille under this new French Decree (which is currently under appeal to the European Court of Human Rights), then Ryanair will close its Marseille base at the end of the current Summer schedule (October), and from November it will only fly to/from Marseille on aircraft which are based outside France, and all of the mobile crews in Marseille will also be transferred to non French bases. This will mean that;
four Irish registered aircraft will be transferred to other non French bases in the EU,
the loss of 120 Ryanair jobs at Marseille, as crews are transferred elsewhere in Europe,
a reduction in the number of Ryanair’s daily flights at Marseille from 33 to 16,
a 1,000,000 cut in Ryanair’s traffic at Marseille from over 1.7m to under 800,000 p.a.,
a cut in jobs supported by Ryanair at Marseille from 1,600 to less than 600,
a cut in the number of Ryanair routes served to/from Marseille Airport from 26 to 16.

Ryanair regrets (and hopes to avoid) this Marseille base closure, but it is not prepared to have its lawful contractual arrangements subjected to false reporting in the French media or what it believes would be an unlawful prosecution (under current EU law) by Aix-en-Provence investigators. If Ryanair’s €300m investment and 120 jobs in Marseille Airport are not welcome, then Ryanair will relocate these aircraft, these jobs and these passengers elsewhere in Europe, where airports are clamouring to attract Ryanair, its aircraft, its employees, its traffic and its jobs.

Speaking today in Paris, Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary said:

“Ryanair sincerely regrets the false and inaccurate claims made recently about our Marseille base in the French press, which failed to report Ryanair’s response. These allegations were inaccurate and designed to damage Ryanair’s operationsin Marseille, as well as our investment in France. All of Ryanair’s mobile employees are employed on lawful EU contracts. They are required to – and do - pay taxes, social insurance and pension fees in accordance with EU regulations as a condition of their employment in Ryanair.

“We are not prepared to have our good name and reputation damaged by these unattributed leaks in the French media or by an unjustified ongoing investigation in Aix-en- Provence. If the French authorities, or the French regions, don’t want Ryanair to invest in bases and jobs at their regional airports, then we will simply move those aircraft and jobs elsewhere in Europe.

“This has happened before, where Ryanair flights on the Strasbourg-London route were blocked by an Air France Court action in 2003. As a result traffic on the Strasbourg-London route has collapsed by over 85% from over 150,000 passengers p.a in 2003, to less than 20,000 in 2009, while Ryanair moved these flights and jobs across the border to Baden Baden, where traffic has increased from zero in 2003 to over 500,000 p.a. in 2009. France’s loss has been Germany’s gain. It is disappointing to note that having forced Ryanair off the route, Air France subsequently reduced their traffic on the Strasbourg-London route by more than 50% through high fares, fuel surcharges and reduced flight frequencies.

Should the Aix-en-Provence authorities initiate any Court action against Ryanair’s lawful Marseille operations, then jobs, traffic and inward investment will be lost in Marseille. The only people who benefit will be Air France, who will again have eliminated competition, while consumers and visitors at Marseille will suffer higher fares.”

“We would also respectfully request that Le Figaro or any other French newspaper wishing to write an article of false claims about Ryanair, would at least extend us the courtesy of sending us these claims in advance of publication, allowing us to respond and then accurately reporting our response. We sincerely regret that Le Figaro didn’t bother with these basic courtesies of a free press in this instance.”
 
Ryanair sostiene che il suo personale navigante lavori a bordo dei suoi aerei immatricolati in Irlanda e per questo tecnicamente sono considerati territorio irlandese, quindi i dipendenti vengono pagati e pagano le tasse e i contributi secondo le leggi di questo Paese. Mi sembra corretto stante anche la libera circolazione dei lavoratori all' interno della UE.
 
Ryanair sostiene che il suo personale navigante lavori a bordo dei suoi aerei immatricolati in Irlanda e per questo tecnicamente sono considerati territorio irlandese, quindi i dipendenti vengono pagati e pagano le tasse e i contributi secondo le leggi di questo Paese. Mi sembra corretto stante anche la libera circolazione dei lavoratori all' interno della UE.

Quindi se io lavoro per la Samsung, devo sottostare alle leggi sul lavoro coreane ?
 
Quindi se io lavoro per la Samsung, devo sottostare alle leggi sul lavoro coreane ?

Stiamo parlando di UE, comunque credo che la differenza la faccia il luogo di lavoro, Ryanair punta sulla tesi della extraterritorialità degli aerei quindi è come se i suoi dipendenti lavorassero fisicamente in Irlanda.
 
Sarebbe interessante conoscere la normativa UE in materia.
 
Ryanair sostiene che il suo personale navigante lavori a bordo dei suoi aerei immatricolati in Irlanda e per questo tecnicamente sono considerati territorio irlandese, quindi i dipendenti vengono pagati e pagano le tasse e i contributi secondo le leggi di questo Paese. Mi sembra corretto stante anche la libera circolazione dei lavoratori all' interno della UE.

Quindi chi a Roma lavora presso l'ambasciata indiana o cinese ( i locali dell'ambasciata sono considerati territorio del Paese rappresentato ) percepisce stipendio indiano o cinese e "gode" della relativa normativa sul lavoro ???
 
Stiamo parlando di UE, comunque credo che la differenza la faccia il luogo di lavoro, Ryanair punta sulla tesi della extraterritorialità degli aerei quindi è come se i suoi dipendenti lavorassero fisicamente in Irlanda.

Scusa ma i lavoratori della base di MRS risiedono in Francia e si recano al lavoro sul suolo francese, non in Eire.
 
Stiamo parlando di UE, comunque credo che la differenza la faccia il luogo di lavoro, Ryanair punta sulla tesi della extraterritorialità degli aerei quindi è come se i suoi dipendenti lavorassero fisicamente in Irlanda.


E ancora: i naviganti timbrano il cartellino esattamente all'ingresso dell'aereo, e quindi si troveranno sempre in territorio irlandese, o una parte del loro lavoro, siano pure 5 minuti, si svolge anche a terra ?
 
Quindi chi a Roma lavora presso l'ambasciata indiana o cinese ( i locali dell'ambasciata sono considerati territorio del Paese rappresentato ) percepisce stipendio indiano o cinese e "gode" della relativa normativa sul lavoro ???

I dipendenti di un ambasciata credo siano da considerare come se fossero dipendenti del ministero degli Esteri del loro Paese che rappresentano, non so se esiste una normativa ad hoc per questi casi.

Ci vorrebbe qualcuno esperto in diritto internazionale
 
I dipendenti di un ambasciata credo siano da considerare come se fossero dipendenti del ministero degli Esteri del loro Paese che rappresentano, non so se esiste una normativa ad hoc per questi casi.

Appunto. Per cui gli impiegati all'ambasciata cinese dovrebbero percepire stipendio cinese ( 400 euro mensili se ti va bene ).
 
Ma poi che noia con questi continui e pressanti ricatti di questa società irlandese, su ogni tematica.

E' ora di finirla.
 
Ma poi che noia con questi continui e pressanti ricatti di questa società irlandese, su ogni tematica.

La politica di FR è questa, può essere criticabile ma finora i risultati le stanno dando ragione, bisogna vedere se continuerà cosi anche in futuro.

Come funziona con le basi Easyjet di ORY e CDG? Anche loro hanno problemi simili?
 
La nazionalità di una nave credo sia data dalla bandiera sotto cui è registrata indipendentemente da dove sta navigando.

Cioè vorresti giustificare il comportamento delle compagnie d'armamento che registrano le navi in paesi come la Liberia, con leggi lavorative da schiavisti dell'800 ?