E dire che ci abbiamo creduto fino alla fine che questi riuscissero a riportarlo a casa!
Guerra in Ucraina
- Autore Discussione East End Ave
- Data d'inizio
E dire che ci abbiamo creduto fino alla fine che questi riuscissero a riportarlo a casa!
non aspettavo altro che vedere terra e chicchi di grano volare in aria e nel polverone (o nel nevischio) vederlo alzarsi in volo!
Sarebbe stata quasi storica!
Mi era sempre sembrata un po’ una uauata, ma anche se avessero veramente voluto tentarla, dove trovi i piloti disposti a rischiare la pelle?
Stanno reclutando kenyani e cubani per andare in Ucraina regalando loro la cittadinanza, avrebbero trovato il modo anche qui
E' precipitato nei dintorni di Belgorod un IL76, con a bordo 74 persone (65 prigionieri ucraini, 6 membri dell'equipaggio e 3 non meglio precisati accompagnatori). Non ci sarebbero superstiti, i prigionieri erano oggetto di scambio coi russi.
www.repubblica.it
Guerra Ucraina - Russia, le news del 24 gennaio. Precipita un aereo russo a Belgorod. Mosca: “Barbarie. A bordo 65 prigionieri”. Kiev: “Trasportava missili”. Orbán: “Sosteniamo l’ingresso della Svezia nella Nato”
In mattinata nuovi bombardamenti russi su Kharkiv, 8 feriti. Si aggrava il bilancio dell’attacco di ieri: 18 i morti.
www.repubblica.it
Siamo alle comiche, in un contesto di tragedia!
Arriva anche l'immancabile video
video.repubblica.it
Il video dell'aereo russo precipitato a Belgorod: scambio di accuse tra Mosca e Kiev
Alle 11 ore locali un aereo russo Ilyushin II-76 è precipitato nella regione di Belgorod. Lo scambio di accuse tra Kiev e Mosca è stato immediato. Secondo il Cremlino il velivolo trasportava 65 prigionieri di guerra e 6 membri dell’equipaggio. Kiev conferma lo schianto ma contrasta la versione...
video.repubblica.it
Osi dubitare di quanto riferito dal Cremlino?
Aeroflot Group settles claims on another batch of leased aircraft
Aeroflot Group has reached financial settlements with lessors covering another seven aircraft.
www.flightglobal.com
“E se non firmi fai la fine di quello di oggi…spasibo!”Aeroflot Group settles claims on another batch of leased aircraft
Aeroflot Group has reached financial settlements with lessors covering another seven aircraft.
Posto qui, anche se non so se collegabile alla guerra.
airlive.net
BREAKING A Russian Ilyushin Il-76 with engine in fire has crashed in Ivanovo
A Russian Il-76 caught on fire in the air in Ivanovo, Russia, causing the plane to crash. Russian Telegram channels report that an aircraft caught fire in Russian Ivanovo airfield and sharply began to descend. Preliminary reports indicate there were at least 12 people onboard the plane. The...
airlive.net
Southwind Airlines non potrà volare in tutta la UE
Il 25 marzo 2024, l’Agenzia finlandese per i trasporti e le comunicazioni ha vietato alla compagnia aerea turca Southwind Airlines di operare voli verso la Finlandia. Secondo l’agenzia,…
italiavola.com
Compagnia controllata dai russiSouthwind Airlines non potrà volare in tutta la UE
Il 25 marzo 2024, l’Agenzia finlandese per i trasporti e le comunicazioni ha vietato alla compagnia aerea turca Southwind Airlines di operare voli verso la Finlandia. Secondo l’agenzia,…
Damaged Emirates A380 was ferried out of Moscow
Following the incident at Moscow, Domodedovo airport, a damaged A380 has left Moscow. An Emirates A380 was damaged in Moscow on March, 27 2024 when a truck crashed under the belly of the wide-body airliner. The aircraft (registration A6-EDM) was planned to operate flight EK134 from Moscow to...
airlive.net
Ultime notizie da Simon sull'A320 di Ural atterrato nel campo di grano (grassetto mio).
On Apr 11th 2024 the airline stated that they have given up all plans to get the accident aircraft airborne again. Instead, the aircraft will be used for spare parts of other aircraft in their fleet and will be dismantled on the field. Two long term managers of the airline, 31 and 24 years working for the airline, have been dismissed as result of the accident and a new report by Rosaviatsia due to "deficiencies in ensuring flight safety, organizing flight work and professional training of flight crew members at the airline" as the reasons for the lack of training of pilots to act in a complicated situation. The report also highlighted the unsatisfactory level of professional preparedness by the flight crew like insufficient system knowledge and crew interaction as well as incorrect calculation of landing characteristics like required fuel. The crew performance was disorganized and inconsistent, the crew did not detect the landing gear had not retracted although the sensors were all indicating the gear was still fully extended, the crew did not consider to return to Omsk at all, although weather conditions and length of runway would have permitted a return. The unreasonable decision by the commander to divert to Novosibirsk did not take into account the landing gears' positions and thus lacked 5.6 tons of fuel to reach Novosibirsk. In an interview with Rosaviatsia the commander stated that the airline had recommended to divert to an airfield with trained maintenance available if a malfunction occurs, the closest such airfield to Omsk was Novosibirsk. This recommendation was removed by the airline following the accident.
On Apr 11th 2024 the airline stated that they have given up all plans to get the accident aircraft airborne again. Instead, the aircraft will be used for spare parts of other aircraft in their fleet and will be dismantled on the field. Two long term managers of the airline, 31 and 24 years working for the airline, have been dismissed as result of the accident and a new report by Rosaviatsia due to "deficiencies in ensuring flight safety, organizing flight work and professional training of flight crew members at the airline" as the reasons for the lack of training of pilots to act in a complicated situation. The report also highlighted the unsatisfactory level of professional preparedness by the flight crew like insufficient system knowledge and crew interaction as well as incorrect calculation of landing characteristics like required fuel. The crew performance was disorganized and inconsistent, the crew did not detect the landing gear had not retracted although the sensors were all indicating the gear was still fully extended, the crew did not consider to return to Omsk at all, although weather conditions and length of runway would have permitted a return. The unreasonable decision by the commander to divert to Novosibirsk did not take into account the landing gears' positions and thus lacked 5.6 tons of fuel to reach Novosibirsk. In an interview with Rosaviatsia the commander stated that the airline had recommended to divert to an airfield with trained maintenance available if a malfunction occurs, the closest such airfield to Omsk was Novosibirsk. This recommendation was removed by the airline following the accident.