Grande spiegazione... volevo fare solo una piccola correzione: l'asse taxiway successivo alla stopbar è spento per 90m
767 near miss (BCN July 6, 2014)
- Autore Discussione Given77
- Data d'inizio
Grande spiegazione... volevo fare solo una piccola correzione: l'asse taxiway successivo alla stopbar è spento per 90m
Se ho capito bene, sono stati effettuati dei test a Linate sulla taxiway Tango (quella parallela alla pista). Di più non saprei.
"il pilota effettua un'impennata".....e se ne va fischiettando.
Nemmeno supergiovane arriverebbe a tanto.
Nemmeno supergiovane arriverebbe a tanto.
No, Aerolineas è una delle poche (se non l'unica) compagnia a decollare dalla 25R per questioni di performance. La 25R è la più lunga e meno limitata per ostacoli
AR si chiama fuori, ma un go-around non mi sembra proprio una procedura standard, tutt'altro! Ovvero, diviene standard quando le cose non vanno come dovrebbero con l'aeromobile oppure on the ground. Mah...sembra che se la cantino e se la suonino tra AENA e AR, manca ancora UTair a dire la sua...
Aerolíneas Argentinas clarifies that in the alleged incident at El Prat airport in Barcelona on Saturday 5 July, involving an aircraft of the Russian airline UTair and an Aerolíneas Argentinas aircraft, there was no risk at any time.
This has been corroborated by the manager of the Spanish airports operator AENA (Spanish Airports and Air Navigation) who initially reported that "both planes were where they should be."
Moreover, a spokesman of AENA also said that "the landing of the UTair aircraft could have been done without risk, since both aircraft were in the proper place, with enough distance between them."
This is consistent with the report made by the captain of the Aerolineas Argentinas aircraft, who said the AR plane followed the instructions of El Prat control tower.
This morning AENA issued a statement that ensures that the "go-around" performed by the Russian aircraft "is a standard procedure, with all the guarantees of safety".
Thus Aerolineas Argentinas clarifies that the situation recorded by a plane spotter and widely publicized by the media, related to flight AR 1163 on Saturday 5 July, did not involve any risk.
Aerolíneas Argentinas clarifies that in the alleged incident at El Prat airport in Barcelona on Saturday 5 July, involving an aircraft of the Russian airline UTair and an Aerolíneas Argentinas aircraft, there was no risk at any time.
This has been corroborated by the manager of the Spanish airports operator AENA (Spanish Airports and Air Navigation) who initially reported that "both planes were where they should be."
Moreover, a spokesman of AENA also said that "the landing of the UTair aircraft could have been done without risk, since both aircraft were in the proper place, with enough distance between them."
This is consistent with the report made by the captain of the Aerolineas Argentinas aircraft, who said the AR plane followed the instructions of El Prat control tower.
This morning AENA issued a statement that ensures that the "go-around" performed by the Russian aircraft "is a standard procedure, with all the guarantees of safety".
Thus Aerolineas Argentinas clarifies that the situation recorded by a plane spotter and widely publicized by the media, related to flight AR 1163 on Saturday 5 July, did not involve any risk.
all'apparenza qualcosa di vagamente simile a MXP ieri
aereo che taxa, altro che sta atterrando........quello che taxa taglia la pista all'altro che sta atterrando che riattacca (anche se immagino con molto più margine di sicurezza rispetto a BCN)
Il 767 era il volo AA da MIA appena atterrato sulla 35R 4 minuti prima del 320 U2 da LGW sulla 35L (poi abortito)
Runway incursion a Milano Malpensa
L’Agenzia nazionale per la sicurezza del volo (ANSV) ha aperto una inchiesta di sicurezza per inconveniente grave a seguito della runway incursion (occupazione indebita di pista) verificatasi il 15 luglio sull’aeroporto di Milano Malpensa. Per cause in via di accertamento, un B767 proveniente dagli Stati Uniti interessava la pista 35L mentre era in atterraggio un A320 proveniente dal Regno Unito. A seguito della situazione venutasi a creare, l’A320 veniva istruito dalla Torre di controllo ad effettuare una procedura di mancato avvicinamento.
aereo che taxa, altro che sta atterrando........quello che taxa taglia la pista all'altro che sta atterrando che riattacca (anche se immagino con molto più margine di sicurezza rispetto a BCN)
Il 767 era il volo AA da MIA appena atterrato sulla 35R 4 minuti prima del 320 U2 da LGW sulla 35L (poi abortito)
Runway incursion a Milano Malpensa
L’Agenzia nazionale per la sicurezza del volo (ANSV) ha aperto una inchiesta di sicurezza per inconveniente grave a seguito della runway incursion (occupazione indebita di pista) verificatasi il 15 luglio sull’aeroporto di Milano Malpensa. Per cause in via di accertamento, un B767 proveniente dagli Stati Uniti interessava la pista 35L mentre era in atterraggio un A320 proveniente dal Regno Unito. A seguito della situazione venutasi a creare, l’A320 veniva istruito dalla Torre di controllo ad effettuare una procedura di mancato avvicinamento.
...pure a MAD 'sti ATC's sono un po' lenti...
http://avherald.com/h?article=47923d7c&opt=0
By Simon Hradecky, created Thursday, Aug 21st 2014 18:56Z, last updated Thursday, Aug 21st 2014 18:56Z
An Iberia Airbus A319-100, registration EC-JEI performing flight IB-3471 from Zurich (Switzerland) to Madrid,SP (Spain) with 98 passengers and 5 crew, was on approach to Madrid's runway 18L and received landing clearance. The aircraft overflew an airport vehicle on the runway near the threshold and landed safely on runway 18L.
Spain's CIAIAC reported on Aug 21st 2014 that the vehicle had been cleared to perform a runway inspection due to the presence of birds. The tower controller attempted to raise the driver several times on radio to instruct the vehicle to leave the runway, but repeated contact attempts failed. Tower had cleared the aircraft to land anticipating the vehicle would have vacated the runway at touch down. The investigation is continuing focussing on aspects of radio coverage at the aerodrome and questions why the vehicle driver could not be contacted. (Editorial note: The CIAIAC statement does not contain indication that the investigation is trying to clarify why the landing clearance was issued and why no go-around instruction was issued).
http://avherald.com/h?article=47923d7c&opt=0
By Simon Hradecky, created Thursday, Aug 21st 2014 18:56Z, last updated Thursday, Aug 21st 2014 18:56Z
An Iberia Airbus A319-100, registration EC-JEI performing flight IB-3471 from Zurich (Switzerland) to Madrid,SP (Spain) with 98 passengers and 5 crew, was on approach to Madrid's runway 18L and received landing clearance. The aircraft overflew an airport vehicle on the runway near the threshold and landed safely on runway 18L.
Spain's CIAIAC reported on Aug 21st 2014 that the vehicle had been cleared to perform a runway inspection due to the presence of birds. The tower controller attempted to raise the driver several times on radio to instruct the vehicle to leave the runway, but repeated contact attempts failed. Tower had cleared the aircraft to land anticipating the vehicle would have vacated the runway at touch down. The investigation is continuing focussing on aspects of radio coverage at the aerodrome and questions why the vehicle driver could not be contacted. (Editorial note: The CIAIAC statement does not contain indication that the investigation is trying to clarify why the landing clearance was issued and why no go-around instruction was issued).