View attachment 8949Non so se è vera la notizia, ma in Indonesia aereo atterra con carrello e ruota guasta.
I meant exactly that, there is no instrument procedure available (legally and officially at least), no instrument approaches have been published, no ILS, no VOR (no such systems on the aerodrome), no NDB (NDB is available on the aerodrome), no RNAV (GPS, ...), thus no instrument approach procedures can legally be used. The aerodrome is strictly visual approach only.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
Thank you for your answer. This "self positioning" is something you suppose or is common practice at this aerodrome?I meant exactly that, there is no instrument procedure available (legally and officially at least), no instrument approaches have been published, no ILS, no VOR (no such systems on the aerodrome), no NDB (NDB is available on the aerodrome), no RNAV (GPS, ...), thus no instrument approach procedures can legally be used. The aerodrome is strictly visual approach only.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
Glad to have you on board, Simon, and thanks for all your hard work over the years.
Glad to have you on board, Simon, and thanks for all your hard work over the years.
I meant exactly that, there is no instrument procedure available (legally and officially at least), no instrument approaches have been published, no ILS, no VOR (no such systems on the aerodrome), no NDB (NDB is available on the aerodrome), no RNAV (GPS, ...), thus no instrument approach procedures can legally be used. The aerodrome is strictly visual approach only.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
I meant exactly that, there is no instrument procedure available (legally and officially at least), no instrument approaches have been published, no ILS, no VOR (no such systems on the aerodrome), no NDB (NDB is available on the aerodrome), no RNAV (GPS, ...), thus no instrument approach procedures can legally be used. The aerodrome is strictly visual approach only.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
Glad to have you on board, Simon, and thanks for all your hard work over the years.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
I meant exactly that, there is no instrument procedure available (legally and officially at least), no instrument approaches have been published, no ILS, no VOR (no such systems on the aerodrome), no NDB (NDB is available on the aerodrome), no RNAV (GPS, ...), thus no instrument approach procedures can legally be used. The aerodrome is strictly visual approach only.
What may have been done however is the use of GPS for positioning the aircraft (not legal), or even the NDB on the aerodrome (also not legal for approach and landing).
Servus aus Salzburg
Simon Hradecky
This "self positioning" is something you suppose or is common practice at this aerodrome?