Volo Lion Air 737 MAX si schianta in Indonesia


Ma vi sembra normale pubblicare la pagina di un techlog, documento ufficiale, con tanto di nomi e cognomi di piloti, tecnici e azioni di manutenzione svolte che riguarderebbero l'aereo coinvolto nell'incidente con investigation appena iniziata ? Il fatto che l'abbiate pescato su qualche pagina in giro per il web non significa che sia corretto farlo e soprattutto legale. Almeno cancellate i nomi e i numeri di riferimento delle pagine no ? Sono basito.
 
airport81 ha detto:
Il 60% sono autisti dei cieli, il 40% sono Piloti....Secondo te quei 2 in quale percentuale rientrano?!
Clicca per espandere...

Prima che tu riapra la bocca per farle prendere aria, ti vorrei dire che:

1) 'quei due' sono comunque vittime di un disatro le cui cause sono tuttora IGNOTE. Rispetto, per cortesia.
2) l 60% sono autisti dei cieli, il 40% sono Piloti= il 60% sono camerieri dei cieli, il 40% assistenti di volo, giusto per farti capire il livello della tua osservazione.

Torniamo nei ranghi, per cortesia.
 
On Oct 31st 2018 the Ministry advised that the technical director of LionAir has been suspended for 120 days (not fired as a number of media reported).
On Oct 31st 2018 a local fisherman reported they (he and his friends) were out on the Java Sea to fish for shrimps when they observed a white airplane with an orange pattern in some distance, the aircraft was flying unusually low. The aircraft appeared to roll in for a turn when it shook and swooped sharply and impacted the waters of the sea. Immediately after a sound of thunder or explosion occurred. They were afraid of approaching the source of the sound and decided to return to the coast which was about 3 hours away. After arriving at the coast they saw the coast was crowded with many residents looking out over the waters, there were emergency vehicles and policemen in the crowd. They talked to a policeman and told him about their observation, police asked them to show them the crash site. After a trip of about 3 hours back to the location they found debris, body parts and oil slicks on the surface of the water. Soon after many more ships arrived at the scene.
Clicca per espandere...

Da: AvH aggiornarnato alle 14:15Z
 
Secondo AVH è morto uno dei sub che stava lavorando nell'area :(.
Tra le parti più grandi recuperate una sezione del carrello (non dice quale). Deve aver picchiato parecchio duro se in un'area relativamente limitata e poco profonda fino ad ora hanno recuperato solo "debris".
 
Qualcuno potrebbe cercare di spiegare quanto riportato da AVHerald

"On Nov 5th 2018, following the KNKT release confirming airspeed indicator problems during the last 4 flights of the aircraft, a tweet posted on Oct 29th 2018 at 07:07Z by Razaan Botutihe gained sufficient weight to be rated as factual. The tweet states concerning flight JT-43 from Denpasar (Indonesia) to Jakarta, the last flight the aircraft completed: "Airspeed unreliable and alt disagree shown after take off. STS was also running to the wrong direction, suspected because of speed difference. Identified that CAPT instrument was unreliable and handover control to FO. Continue NNC of Airspeed Unreliable and ALT disagree." (Editorial Notes: STS: speed trim system. As far as is known so far the accident crew managed to control the aircraft for 12 minutes from takeoff to maintaining 5000 feet at about 290-310 knots over ground between 5000 and 5400 feet, which suggests they were flying on pitch and power for that time, it thus appears something beyond unreliable airspeed and altitude must have contributed to the loss of control in minute 13.) In addition three different versions of a maintenance logbook were leaked to the Internet, after a closer look they all appeared to show the same log book at different point in time. Apart from the remark of unreliable airspeed and altitude, which prompted the flushing of the captain's static ports, an entry for elevator feel computer light illuminated was written down by the flight crew of JT-93 (presumably a typo and believed to be JT-43), maintenance opened and cleaned a cannon plug connector for the elevator feel computer, checks by the Aviation Herald with AMEs and related Maintenance Manuals confirmed the log book appeared authentic, the maintenance activity concerning that plug however could not have changed the forces on the pitch control of the yoke, only the status and error messages concerning the system could have been affected by the maintenance activity. The elevator feel computer has its own static and dynamic ports positioned at the tail of the aircraft, is purely mechanical with no electronic components except for some status monitoring, depends on hydraulic systems A and B available and does not depend on the instrumentation/Air Data References used for pilot instrumentation."

grazie
 
Devi accedere o registrarti per rispondere qui.


Top Bottom