JU-Air JU52 distrutto sulle alpi svizzere


jetboy

jetboy

Principiante
Utente Registrato
3 Luglio 2008
479
27
0
Come da titolo.

A Ju-Air Junkers JU-52 ("Tante Ju", "Auntie Ju"), registration HB-HOT further flight data currently unknown, impacted terrain at an elevation of about 2250 meters/7400 feet at Piz Segnas (Switzerland) at about 16:50L (14:50Z). A Rescue and Recovery operation has been initiated.
Local Police confirmed a Junkers aircraft crashed at Piz Segnas, no further details are known, 5 helicopters have been dispatched for rescue and recovery.
Ground observers watched the aircraft flying in the area over Obersaxen (Switzerland) south of Piz Segnas and estimated they were flying at 11,000 feet. Fonte Avherald.

Un pensiero alle eventuali vittime e ad un pezzo di storia che se ne va per sempre...
 
https://www.tio.ch/svizzera/cronaca/1313028/precipita-un-altro-aereo--questa-volta-sopra-a-flims
Precipita un altro aereo, questa volta sopra a Flims
È il secondo incidente aereo avvenuto oggi in Svizzera, dopo quello di stamattina a Hergiswil che ha ucciso una famiglia
ATS/G.D.
1 ora faIncidente aereo a Hergiswil, morta un'intera famiglia
9 ore faPiccolo velivolo si schianta al suolo: «Diverse vittime»
FLIMS - A poche ore dal velivolo precipitato a Hergiswil (NW), un altro aereo si è schiantato oggi in Svizzera: un velivolo è precipitato nel pomeriggio nella zona del Piz Segnas, cima di 3099 metri sopra Flims (GR), nella Surselva.

La polizia cantonale dei Grigioni ha confermato l'incidente. Non è noto se vi siano delle vittime. Sul posto stanno convergendo diversi elicotteri e i soccorsi arriverebbero anche dal versante nord della montagna, dal canton Glarona. Il velivolo precipitato era multiposto, precisano le forze dell'ordine.

Secondo un esperto di aviazione, l'aereo precipitato è uno Ju-52 - anche chiamato Aunt Ju - il Ju-Air, con capienza per 15-17 passeggeri e due piloti.

L'incidente sarebbe avvenuto intorno alle 16.50. I rottami del velivolo si troverebbero a un'altitudine di 2250 metri. L'Ufficio federale dell'aviazione civile (UFAC) ha decretato il blocco della spazio aereo nella regione del Pinz Segnas.

Oggi è un giorno nero per l'aviazione in Svizzera: in mattinata un velivolo è caduto in un bosco a Hergiswil, nel canton Nidvaldo.


Kantonspolizei GR
✔
@KapoGR
Flugzeugabsturz Piz Segnas
3 zivile Helikopter, 2 Rega-Helikopter und ein
Grossaufgebot an Rettungskräften im Einsatz.

18:40 - 4 ago 2018
4
Visualizza altri Tweet di Kantonspolizei GR
Informazioni e privacy per gli annunci di Twitter
 
The plane that crashed was a Junker JU-52 (affectionately known as 'Tante Ju' or 'Auntie Ju' in German), owned and operated by the JU-AIR company based in Dübendorf, which specialises in sightseeing flights. The plane was constructed in 1939, according to the Swiss news agency.
The Blick newspaper reported that the aircraft - which can carry 17 passengers along with three crew members - was fully booked for the flight from Locarno in canton Ticino over the Alps to the military airport of Dübendorf in canton Zurich.
JU-AIR confirmed only that people were present on board, without giving precise numbers. A telephone numberexternal link has been made available for the families of passengers to call for more information.
The cause of the crash is as yet unknown.

Fonte: swissinfo.ch
 
Visto più volte volare sopra le Alpi svizzere, era sicuramente affascinante per il rombo particolare dei sui motori radiali e per la velocità assai ridotta, da “vecchia signora”. Cordoglio alle famiglie
 
Mah, volava a circa 3000m di quota, se c’erano 15-20C erano già tanti, al limite il problema avrebbe dovuto esserci a Magadino al decollo, dove ci stanno stati 33-34 C. Oltretutto nemmeno una chiamata alla radio, nulla di nulla. Deve essere stata una cosa improvvisa. Immagino che dall’analisi dei rottami qualche cosa salterà fuori
 
Oggi da avherald:
On Aug 6th 2018 a ground witness, a military pilot, reported he had observed the aircraft from his garden about 10 minutes prior to the accident. He saw the aircraft rolling to initiate a left turn when all of the sudden the aircraft tipped over to the left and nose down. One of the motors roared up and seconds later the aircraft was stabilized again and continued its flight normally. The military pilot believes this was a first indication of a serious control problem. It is probable, the witness continued, that they had the problem again up in the mountains and were not able to correct it. If the controls fail in this scenario with the aircraft tipping to the side the nose drops and the aircraft impacts ground near vertical.
Clicca per espandere...
 
la Ju-Air ne ha altri 2 esemplari. Tutti e tre appartenevano all'aeronautica svizzera, che li aveva dismessi nel 1981 (dopo un lunga carriera, direi...)
 
Nessun incidente particolare ma un atterraggio molto duro che ha portato ad un'ispezione approfondita che ha rivelato segni di affaticamento della struttura delle ali. Un anno a terra per sostituire completamente la parte portante delle ali ed ora la nostra Tante Ju è nuovamente in volo. In quel periodo avevamo noleggiato un Ju della Ju Air ma non ricordo la matricola.
 
LH243 ha detto:
Nessun incidente particolare ma un atterraggio molto duro che ha portato ad un'ispezione approfondita che ha rivelato segni di affaticamento della struttura delle ali. Un anno a terra per sostituire completamente la parte portante delle ali ed ora la nostra Tante Ju è nuovamente in volo. In quel periodo avevamo noleggiato un Ju della Ju Air ma non ricordo la matricola.
Clicca per espandere...

Ecco parlavo appunto di questo! Bene che si sia sistemato tutto per il meglio!
 
Pubblicato rapporto del SUST -> https://www.sust.admin.ch/inhalte/AV-berichte/HB-HOT/EN/SB_HB-HOT_E.pdf

Siccome so' svizzeri, c'è anche un bel video ->


Direct cause
The accident is attributable to the fact that after losing control of the aircraft there was insufficient space to regain control, thus the aircraft collided with the terrain.
The investigation identified the following direct causal factors of the accident:
  • The flight crew piloted the aircraft in a very high-risk manner by navigating it into a narrow valley at low altitude and with no possibility of an alternative flight path.
  • The flight crew chose a dangerously low airspeed as regard to the flight path.
Both factors meant that the turbulence which was to be expected in such circum- stances was able to lead not only to a short-term stall with loss of control but also to an unrectifiable situation.

Directly contributory factors
The investigation identified the following factors as directly contributing to the accident:
  • The flight crew was accustomed to not complying with recognised rules for safe flight operations and taking high risks.
  • The aircraft involved in the accident was operated with a centre of gravity posi- tion that was beyond the rear limit. This situation facilitated the loss of control.
Systemic cause
The investigation identified the following systemic cause of the accident:
  • The requirements for operating the aircraft in commercial air transport opera- tions with regard to the legal basis applicable at the time of the accident were not met.
Systemically contributory factors
The investigation identified the following factors as systemically contributing to the accident:
  • Due to the air operator’s inadequate working equipment, it was not possible to calculate the accurate mass and centre of gravity of its Ju 52 aircraft.
  • In particular, the air operator’s flight crews who were trained as Air Force pilots seemed to be accustomed to systematically failing to comply with generally recognised aviation rules and to taking high risks when flying Ju 52 aircraft.
  • The air operator failed to identify or prevent both the deficits and risks which occurred during operations and the frequent violation of rules by its flight crews.
  • Numerous incidents, including several serious incidents, were not reported to the competent bodies and authorities. This meant that they were unable to take measures to improve safety.
  • The supervisory authority failed to some extent to identify the numerous opera- tional shortcomings and risks or to take effective, corrective action.
Other risks
The investigation identified the following factors to risk, which had no or no demon- strable effect on the occurrence of the accident, but which should nevertheless be eliminated in order to improve aviation safety:
  • The aircraft was in poor technical condition.
  • The aircraft was no longer able to achieve the originally demonstrated flight performance.
  • The maintenance of the air operator’s aircraft was not organised in a manner that was conducive to the objective.
  • The training of flight crews with regard to the specific requirements for flight operations and crew resource management was inadequate.
  • The flight crews had not been familiarised with all critical situations regarding the behaviour of the aircraft in the event of a stall.
  • The supervisory authority failed to identify numerous technical shortcomings or to take corrective action.
  • The expertise of the individuals employed by the air operator, maintenance companies and the supervisory authority was in parts insufficient.
 
Il video e di una bellezza e di una professionalità unica, da rabbrividire ciò che e successo.
Cavolo che ottima spiegazione e una volta di più "chapeau" agli svizzeri.
 
Devi accedere o registrarti per rispondere qui.


Top Bottom