Emirates "rischia" incidente a DME


danusa86

Principiante
Utente Registrato
28 Settembre 2008
1,098
34
0
Non so se ne avete già parlato, notizia di ieri successo però il 10/09

Updated: 2017-09-18 12:59:25 GMT
An Emirates Airbus A380-800, registration A6-EEZ performing flight EK-131 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Moscow Domodedovo (Russia), was positioning for an approach to Domodedovo's runway 14R about to intercept the extended runway center line about 8nm before the runway threshold when the aircraft descended to about 400 feet AGL, initiated a go around climbing straight ahead and crossing through the localizer to safe altitude. The aircraft subsequently positioned for another approach to runway 14R, aligned with the extended runway center line but did not initiate the final descent and joined the missed approach procedure as result. The aircraft positioned again for an approach to runway 14R and landed without further incident on runway 14R about 35 minutes after the first go around (from 400 feet AGL).

Position and Altitude data transmitted by the aircraft's transponder suggest the aircraft was tracking about 190 degrees magnetic when the aircraft initiated the go around at about 1000 feet MSL about 8nm before the runway threshold, which translates to about 400 feet AGL with the aerodrome elevation at 180 meters/592 feet MSL.

The airline told The Aviation Herald on Sep 18th 2017, that the occurrence is being investigated by United Arab Emirates' Civil Aviation Authority GCAA, the airline apologizes that due to the investigation no further details can be provided.

The GCAA have already sent a first preliminary reply indicating the communication department is about to respond to the questions.

Russia's Rosaviatsia (Civil Aviation Authority) have not yet replied to the inquiry by The Aviation Herald.

Metars (Airport: Moscow, Domodedovo International Airport):
UUDD 102030Z 20003MPS 170V230 9999 -SHRA SCT050CB 14/12 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 102000Z 20003MPS 9999 -SHRA FEW046CB 14/11 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101930Z 21003MPS CAVOK 14/11 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101900Z 21003MPS 170V230 CAVOK 14/11 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101830Z 18003MPS CAVOK 14/11 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101800Z 18004MPS CAVOK 15/11 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101730Z 18004MPS 9999 FEW040 15/12 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101700Z 19003MPS 9999 FEW040 15/12 Q1016 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101630Z 18003MPS CAVOK 15/12 Q1016 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101600Z 17003MPS CAVOK 17/12 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101530Z 17003MPS CAVOK 18/12 Q1015 R88/010095 NOSIG
UUDD 101500Z 18003MPS CAVOK 20/12 Q1016 R88/010095 NOSIG

https://www.aeroinside.com/item/102...und-from-about-400-feet-agl-8nm-before-runway
 
Possibile ma non si dovrebbe fare il crosscheck glideslope / distanza NM prima di seguirlo? Sono curioso del report che seguirá all´investigazione. Da voci interne ad EK pare che i due piloti abbiano dovuto fare le valigie.
 
Da quelle parti le valige te le fanno fare anche se chiedi un caffè della J che non ti spetta...
 
Possibile ma non si dovrebbe fare il crosscheck glideslope / distanza NM prima di seguirlo? Sono curioso del report che seguirá all´investigazione. Da voci interne ad EK pare che i due piloti abbiano dovuto fare le valigie.

Classica reazione di Emirates e Qatar Airways, sintomatiche di una cultura della sicurezza piuttosto primitiva. Mi è piaciuto molto questo pezzo sul licenziamento dei piloti QR coinvolti in un incidente a Miami un paio d'anni fa.
 
Eppure sia l'una (FR) che l'altra (EK) hanno un turn around di piloti molto molto elevato. Mah...