Thread British Airways-Iberia: firmata la fusione dei due vettori


problemi in vista per l'accordo tra le parti?

BA merger faces failure over £2.6bn pensions debt


The Spanish airline Iberia could still walk away from a merger deal with British Airways to create Europe’s largest airline if the British flag carrier is unable to come to an agreement with its pension trustees over how to fund its £2.6 billion pension deficit.
The two airlines finally reached an agreement to merge yesterday after 16 months of discussions.
However, under the terms of the deal, Iberia may terminate the merger if “the outcome of the discussions between British Airways and its pension trustees is not, in Iberia's reasonable opinion, satisfactory because it is materially detrimental to the economic premises of the proposed merger”.
BA is currently valued at £2.6 billion — exactly the same value as the pension deficit.
If Iberia pulls out it will have to pay BA a break fee of €20 million (£18 million). BA and Iberia have also agreed that the Spanish flag carrier will not provide any cash or guarantees to fund the British pension schemes.
The deadline for BA’s discussions with the pension trustees is the end of June next year, although the two carriers hope to reach a definitive merger agreement in the first quarter of 2010.
A spokesperson for BA said that timescales were “still being worked out”.
Shares in BA continued to rise in early trading this morning, up 4.65 per cent at 225p, while Iberia's stock increased by 3.15 per cent to €2.29.
The deal to create Europe’s largest airline by merging the two loss-making companies is expected to set off another round of cost-cutting at both to save £360 million a year.
Willie Walsh, chief executive of BA, who will retain the same position at the merged company, admitted this morning that there would be job cuts. He has already stripped £400 million of costs from the business and 4,900 jobs will go by next March.
Jobs are likely to be lost at head offices in London and Madrid, in maintenance facilities and in the sales forces.
The combined airline will carry 62 million passengers a year, although Ryanair, the budget company, is expected to exceed that figure this year.
BA will be incorporated in Madrid and chaired by a Spaniard, Antonio Vázquez, while the headquarters and stock market listing will be in London. Martin Broughton, currently chairman of BA, will become the deputy chairman of the merged business.
BA and Iberia will continue to pay taxes to their respective Governments.
Iberia’s board of directors in Madrid agreed the terms of the deal yesterday and BA’s directors signed the deal last night, ending 16 months of talks over who should run the combined airline and how much shareholders should own. A holding company will be set up and the two airlines will continue to operate as separate entities within it.
Passengers are unlikely to notice much difference initially but integration could mean Spanish crew and pilots working on BA flights and new menus designed to appeal to Spanish and British tastes.
The most significant impact will be financial as the larger company will be able to strike better deals when buying fuel, aircraft and other supplies.
BA lost £292 million in the six months to September 30; Iberia lost £224 million in the first half of the year and today reported a further loss of €16.4 million (£14.7 million) in the third quarter.
Iberia’s operating revenues fell by 19.6 per cent in the three months to September 30. In a statement the airline said: “The airline industry in Spain is facing exceptionally difficult circumstances.”
“This is a deal that is driven by what is needed in the boardroom rather than on the runway,” Doug McVitie, the managing director of Arran Aerospace, an aviation consultancy, said. “This deal allows BA and Iberia to lean on each other’s shoulders during these tough times.”
The combined airline will also hope to generate additional revenue by offering passengers an expanded route network. BA is strong on transatlantic routes from Heathrow and on routes to Asia, while Iberia is strong on routes to Africa and South America.
BA shareholders will own 56 per cent of the new group and Iberia will have the rest.
The combined airline will be worth £4.5 billion, just behind Lufthansa, which is Europe’s most valuable airline at £4.6 billion.
Mr Walsh said: “This will be good for our passengers, as it will open 59 new destinations for BA customers and 96 new destinations for Iberia. This deal confirms BA as one of Europe’s, and the world’s, leading airlines.”
He said today: "This move is all about the future and I am absolutely delighted that we have reached this stage.
“We are creating a new, strong European airline and this is good news for BA, our customers and our shareholders. We recognise we have strong brands and these will be retained. The BA brand will continue to be a very strong brand."
Gert Zonneveld, aviation analyst at Panmure Gordon, the firm of stockbrokers, said: “Any savings produced by this merger will be welcome, even if it is just a penny. If Willie Walsh has a real go at it, there is a fair chance of getting decent savings out of this.”
Graham Brady, a Conservative member of the Treasury Select Committee, said: “The decision of an iconic British company to relocate its headquarters to Spain is a graphic illustration of how Labour’s high-tax, high-regulation regime is standing in the way of economic recovery.”
Many Spaniards see the merger as a bad move. One critic, who called himself Armageddon, wrote on the website of El Pais newspaper: “British Airways is totally ruined. Only the Titanic has more holes than the pension plan of BA.”
Jose Manuel Rita Moure, writing to the same newspaper, said: “We continue losing our principal business values. We are going to end up as doormen for the worst there is."

timesonline
 
Quali sono gli effetti a livello di antitrust di questa fusione? Credo che dovranno cedere diversi slot sulle rotte UK-Spagna e da MAD e LHR verso gli USA.
 
Sciocchezze, Iberia ha solo 8 slot per MAD, che non cambiano di una virgola il predominio BA a LHR.

anche a me la cosa è suonata strana, proprio per il fatto che IB vola su LHR solo da MAD (8 slot appunto)...

mettendo nel calderone anche gli slot su BCN (i voli son tutti operati da BA ma alcuni slot sono di IB) non si va tanto più lontani

mah...



Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd., BA’s biggest competitor on long-haul flights, said the Iberia deal would increase its rival’s dominance at Heathrow, giving it 44 percent of takeoff and landing slots based on this winter’s schedule.

‘Monster Monopoly’

“It is impossible for any other airline to replicate their scale,” Virgin said in a statement.


l'integrale è Qui
 
British Airways-Iberia, l'insidia viene dalle pensioni inglesi

Dopo 16 mesi di fidanzamento ufficiale (comunicato il 29 luglio 2008), i cda straordinari delle compagnie aeree Iberia e British Airways, riunitisi ieri a Madrid e Londra, hanno deciso la fusione. Nasce il terzo vettore d'europa (dopo Air France-Klm e Lufthansa), con una flotta di 428 aerei, 60 mila dipendenti e un fatturato annuo di 14 miliardi di euro.

In particolare il nuovo gruppo sarà leader nei collegamenti fra Europa e Sud America (tradizionale appannaggio di Iberia) e molto forte verso il Nord America (con il contributo di entrambi i vettori). il presidente della Top Co, società holding depositaria delle azioni delle due linee aeree, sarà il presidente di Iberia, Antonio Vázquez, l'ad sarà il ceo di Ba, Willie Walsh, la sede finanziaria a Londra, quella operativa a Madrid.

Il matrimonio prevede che Iberia controllerà il 45% della nuova Top Co, e ba il 55%. Ognuna delle compagnie, che avranno un numero paritario nel cda, manterrà il proprio brand e la propria gestione. Le due linee aeree avevano già scambi incrociati: il principale azionista di Ba, con il 9,07%, è infatti Iberia (controllata dalla banca pubblica Caja Madrid, quarto istituto di credito spagnolo, guidata dai popolari di centrodestra, al contempo primo azionista della linea aerea spagnola col il 22,95% e della top co con l'11,5%), mentre Ba è il terzo socio della compagnia spagnola con il 13,15%, dopo il 13,37% della holding di grandi magazzini El Corte Inglés. Il governo guidato da Zapatero ha già assicurato che venderà il suo 5,16%.

Il sì di entrambi i partner era nell'aria da tempo, sia per le sinergie che per la complementarietà delle due reti di trasporto. Il problema della complessa trattativa derivava dal fatto che Ba ha perso valore in Borsa, mentre Iberia ha scalato sempre più posizioni, per cui la differenza di capitalizzazione delle due compagnie si è sempre più accorciata (ieri era di 2,79 miliardi di euro per gli inglesi e 1,9 miliardi per gli spagnoli, nonostante ba sia molto più grande di Iberia). Non a caso, all'annuncio del fidanzamento l'ipotesi per la Top Co era del 60% per Ba, il 40% per Iberia mentre, prima della scorsa estate, in piena crisi e con i titoli di ba in picchiata, iberia pretendeva il 60%.

Poi c'era da superare lo scoglio del debito contratto dagli inglesi (tra i cui principali azionisti ci sono i fondi Usa Standard Life, con l'8%, e Invesco, con il 4,3%, oltre che le banche Barclays e Lloyds Banking rispettivamente con 6,9% e il 5,3%) con il piano pensioni dei loro ex lavoratori, pari a 3,3 miliardi di euro. Un buco che gli spagnoli non volevano caricare sulle loro spalle (infatti si riservano il diritto di veto alla fusione se Ba non risolve la questione entro la primavera del 2010). Infine pesano i risultati negativi di Iberia e Ba nonostante gli esuberi (solo nel secondo trimestre 2009, 1.450 dipendenti in meno per Ba, 1.740 per iberia): il passivo è stato di 231 milioni di euro nei primi 6 mesi fiscali di quest'anno per gli inglesi e di 165 milioni di euro nei primi 9 mesi 2009 per gli spagnoli.

Forte rialzo per British Airways e Iberia dopo l'annuncio della fusione che darà vita al terzo polo mondiale nel trasporto aereo. A Londra British Airways mette a segno un progresso del 3,25% mentre Iberia alla borsa di Madrid guadagna il 2,70%.

ilsole24ore
 
Iberia, perdite per 16,4 milioni

Conti in rosso per la compagnia spagnola Iberia, che nella giornata di giovedì ha annunciato il progetto di nozze con British Airways. Nel terzo trimestre il vettore aereo spagnolo ha accusato perdite nette per 16,4 milioni di euro, rispetto all'utile registrato un anno prima, su un fatturato sceso del 20% a 1,17 miliardi. Il calo del 34% dei costi del carburante e del 15% dei costi operativi non è riuscito a compensare la contrazione della domanda. Il tasso di riempimento dei velivoli é sceso all'82,1% (-1,1 punti) e il traffico dei passeggeri trasportati del 5,1% a circa 4,17 milioni. Nei nove mesi le perdite nette sono pari a 181,9 milioni contro un utile di 51,5 milioni.

Iberia sottolinea che è emersa «un'inversione di tendenza» nel terzo trimestre, caratterizzata «da una ripresa» del traffico passeggeri legata in particolare al calo delle tariffe delle compagnie aeree, anche se il settore resta «in una situazione estremamente difficile» con un traffico passeggeri depresso, in particolare sulla rotta Madrid-Barcellona, a causa della concorrenza da parte delle Ferrovie con i treni ad alta velocità.

A seguito del calo della domanda Iberia ha ridotto il numero dei dipendenti e dei collegamenti interni. A fine settembre gli apparecchi in funzione erano 114 rispetto ai 125 di un anno prima, ma malgrado questa riduzione il tasso di occupazione nel solo mese di ottobre é salito all'80,6% (da 79,3% un anno prima).

ilsole24ore
 

Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd., BA’s biggest competitor on long-haul flights, said the Iberia deal would increase its rival’s dominance at Heathrow, giving it 44 percent of takeoff and landing slots based on this winter’s schedule.
‘Monster Monopoly’
“It is impossible for any other airline to replicate their scale,” Virgin said in a statement.

A parte che il 44% non è poi così tanto da parlare di "Monster monopoly" (vorrei vedere quale percentuale degli slot di CDG è in mano ad AF-KLM, o degli slot di FRA e MUC a LH), non trovo nemmeno troppo corretta l'affermazione in base alla quale sarebbe impossibile per qualsiasi altra linea aerea replicare tale scala: una fusione fra Virgin e BMI, per esempio, pur non portando a una scala analoga (sarebbero comunque un bel po' di slot in meno), comporterebbe un aumento del numero di slot molto maggiore rispetto a quello della fusione IB-BA. In tempi di crisi è normale che vi siano selezione e consolidamento.
 
Nota di colore...La statua dell'Ammiraglio Nelson a Trafalgar Square sta' ancora li' a ricordare la memorabile battaglia con L'invicibile Armada!!
Conclusione :- Mi sa' tanto che i Sudditi di Sua maesta' abbiano vinto ancora con questa fusione!!
 
Approfitto del thread per segnalare:
MUC-LHR in CE (ieri) - niente hot towels e drink pre-decollo, pasto ridotto al minimo.
Una delle AV mi ha detto che dal 1 novembre è cambiato un pò tutto e che addirittura si sta pensando di eliminare la C europea sui voli in partenza da LGW.
 
Una delle AV mi ha detto che dal 1 novembre è cambiato un pò tutto e che addirittura si sta pensando di eliminare la C europea sui voli in partenza da LGW.

LGW col progressivo spostamento a LHR dei voli LR che contano, è diventato un aeroporto per traffico leisure e turistico non a caso la prima compagnia è Easyjet. BA con questa mossa si adegua alla concorrenza e alla tipologia media di pax di LGW.
 
Nuovo ostacolo su fusione British Airways e Iberia, ma portavoce BA minimizza

Un´ombra si allunga sulla fusione tra la compagnia di bandiera inglese, British Airways, e il vettore spagnolo, Iberia. Nel fondo pensione del gruppo britannico si nasconderebbe un buco da 2,6 miliardi di sterline. Un particolare non da poco che potrebbe far saltare la fusione con Iberia. Un portavoce della compagnia britannica ha ridimensionato il "problema", aggiungendo che Iberia è a conoscenza della questione.

http://www.finanzaonline.com/notizi...D&folsession=b3a8a4c20a685e052574f54ccecad641
 
Planes in Spain are mainly to BA's gain
Iberia has the right to walk away if British Airways cannot resolve its retirement scheme’s deficit

If you’ve ever felt the urge to chuck it all in and fly to Rio, you might want to do it now. Thanks to the £4.6 billion merger between British Airways and Iberia unveiled last week, BA will at some stage over the next few years stop flying to the Brazilian city — and to Sao Paulo and Buenos Aires, other South American destinations on its network.
Instead, London passengers who want to experience the delights of carnival will have to make a stop in Madrid and change to an Iberia plane. This rejigging of the network is one of the driving forces behind the merger, contributing part of the €400m (£358m) a year the companies plan to generate by pooling their operations.
There was a sense of déjà vu about last week. The two airlines first announced the deal 14 months ago, but negotiations became bogged down by the recession, which battered both their share prices, and uncertainty over BA’s large pension deficit. The talks got going again a few months ago, when a new management team, led by chairman and chief executive Antonio Vazquez, arrived at the Spanish carrier.
Willie Walsh, BA’s chief executive, told analysts the appointment of Vazquez was the key moment. “He brought a new energy and a lot of enthusiasm to the talks. We were able to deal with a lot of the complex issues around governance and structure, and make a lot of progress early on. Before that we had been stuck in a bit of a rut.”
The combined group will be the world’s sixth-largest airline as measured by revenue (£13.4 billion a year) and Europe’s third biggest behind Lufthansa and Air France/ KLM. It will have 418 aircraft, serve 205 destinations and carry 62m passengers a year.
Thanks to the airline industry’s odd legal structure, with route rights governed by questions of sovereignty, the BA/Iberia tie-up is quite a different beast to a normal City takeover. It is modelled on a similar merger engineered five years ago between Air France and KLM. The BA and Iberia brands will stay, as will the separate operating companies, with separate boards. The companies will only come together at the very top level, with the creation of a new holding company that will own all the shares in the two airlines.
Shares in the holding company will be listed in London, with a possible secondary listing in Madrid. Walsh will be chief executive. The current investors in BA and Iberia will see their shares converted into holding company shares, with BA’s owners taking 55% of the merged company. To add to the complexity, there will be separate “national interest” companies that will own majority voting rights in the two airlines. This should stop either airline losing its route rights because they are no longer controlled by nationals of the home country.
BA has been on the hunt for a big deal for most of the past two decades. Acutely aware of the airline’s reliance on a single airport, Heathrow, successive chief executives have sought merger partners. It has looked at deals with (among others) US Airways, United Airlines and Air France, and more recently talked to Qantas and to airlines in India. Analysts say the lack of synergies from the merging of the two networks — apart from BA’s Latin American routes, there is little overlap — shows that BA had started to run out of options. “It’s not easy to see what other option they had,” said Douglas McNeill, transport analyst at Astaire Securities.
The attractions to shareholders come from the €400m a year in synergies the two companies are promising. Two-thirds will come from cost cuts, with the combination of back-office functions and elimination of jobs, and one-third through network rationalisation and extra sales.
Walsh said the certainty about the synergies was key to winning shareholder approval, rather than the size of the stakes being taken by the two sides. “The merger ratio was never really the big issue, in my view. Shareholders were much more interested in whether we would be able to get a deal where we could guarantee synergies. That was really what they wanted, both here and in Spain.”
The deal was also about growth, he said. BA had identified three or four more destinations it wanted to serve in North America, and other potential destinations in Asia. While it didn’t have the runway slots at Heathrow to start services now, a link with Iberia would free up space at the London airport by allowing BA to shift some services — like those to the Latin American cities mentioned previously — to Madrid.
“We will be able to focus the two hubs where they are strongest,” said Walsh. “For London, that means North America and Asia, and for Madrid it means Latin America. We will make decisions about services that are in the interests of the combined entity.”
There was also the prospect of other deals, as the international airline industry continued to consolidate. “I wouldn’t rule out another deal in Europe,” said Walsh. “And I would include BMI [the UK airline that is the second-biggest player at Heathrow] in that, if Lufthansa decide they want to sell it.”
One large obstacle still remains. Iberia has retained the right to walk away if BA is unable to conclude an agreement with the trustees of its retirement schemes on how to fix the group’s yawning pension deficit. Actuaries are putting the final touches to a triennial valuation of the two schemes, with some analysts expecting the final deficit to be more than £3 billion, more than BA’s stock-market value.
The figures is likely to be made public before the end of the year, with BA facing a statutory deadline of June to agree a way of solving the pension problem. If it is not happy with the arrangements, Iberia could withdraw.
Walsh has another, more immediate problem, in the shape of a dispute with cabin crew. The airline wants to cut the equivalent of 2,000 out of 14,000 jobs through voluntary redundancies and part-time working, to take one crew member off many flights, and to introduce for new staff a fresh employment contract with inferior pay and conditions.
Unite, the trade union that represents flight attendants, will begin a ballot for industrial action tomorrow, raising the prospect of disruption to flights at Christmas. If that were not enough to contend with, American regulators are expected to give their long-awaited verdict on a commercial alliance with American Airlines within the next few weeks.
Analysts say BA’s management faces a long list of challenges, but that the agreement with Iberia at least gets one out of the way. Andrew Lobbenberg, an analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland, wrote: “There is a feast of catalysts imminent that have binary outcomes. A whole loaf’s worth of thick buttered toast is currently spinning through the air.” After the Iberia deal was announced, he said: “The first piece of toast has hit the floor buttered-side up.”

Source:
timesonline.co.uk
 
BA cabin crew begin vote on Christmas strike

Robert Lindsay and Catherine Boyle

British Airways' (BA) cabin crew will today begin a vote to decide whether to strike over Christmas as new working practices come into force.
The ballot closes on December 14 and, if staff vote in favour of industrial action, the first strike could start a week later on December 21, affecting vital Christmas traffic.
Unite, the union, is urging the 14,000 cabin crew it represents at the airline to contact employment solicitors with any complaints about the way the new employment rules are working.
Willie Walsh, the chief executive of BA, is proposing a two-year pay freeze for crew, reduced holidays and cuts to the allowances for working on long-haul flights. New employees will start on different contracts without the long-haul bonuses and be paid less.
Of the 14,000 crew affected, more than 3,000 will move to part-time work and 1,000 will take voluntary redundancy.
Unite has set up an e-mail address, with OH Parsons, the employment lawyers, and cabin crew members can use it to log any complaints after the changes. The e-line will serve as a way of collating information for Unite’s legal action against BA, which is due in the High Court on February 1 next year.
Today's vote follows last week's announcement that BA will merge with Spain's Iberia.
The union has said that it will not back the proposed merger between the two loss-making airlines unless it is assured that there will be no more job losses.
Cost-cutting is one of the main reasons behind the £4.5 billion merger, which will create Europe’s largest airline by passenger numbers, carrying 62 million people a year.
The planned new umbrella company, to be known as TopCo, is also facing discontent from workers in Spain. Iberia has proposed a hiring freeze until 2012, a two-year salary freeze and early retirement for cabin crew over 55. In return, Spanish unions have threatened strike action over the proposals and are demanding a 4 per cent pay rise.
Iberia workers are well-paid compared with BA staff, with pilots earning €190,000 (£170,000), well above BA’s average of £107,600. The Spanish pilots also receive a 7.5 per cent bonus every three years.
BA and Iberia will continue to operate as separate airlines under TopCo, which will be incorporated in Spain but have its headquarters and stock market listing in London. If the merger goes ahead, the combined company will be chaired by Antonio Vázquez, the chairman and chief executive of Iberia. BA shareholders will own 55 per cent with the remainder held by Iberia investors.
Mr Walsh, who will lead the combined company after the Iberia merger, gained a reputation as a union-buster and a cost-cutter during his time with Aer Lingus, the Irish airline. He has already has stripped £400 million of costs from BA in the past six months, as it faces competition from no-frills airlines, as well as a decline in demand for business-class travel because of the global economic downturn.
There are still hurdles to the merger with Iberia, including BA’s estimated £3 billion pension fund deficit. Iberia has a get-out clause if BA cannot reach agreement with the trustees of its pension fund on how to deal with the deficit.

timesonline
 
Tajani: "L'accordo British-Iberia rispetti le norme Ue"

"Mi auguro che l'accordo tra British Airways e Iberia avvenga nel rispetto delle norme Ue in particolare riguardo al principio di concorrenza". Lo ha detto il vicepresidente della commissione europea e commissario per i trasporti, Antonio Tajani, a margine della presentazione del piano di azione europeo sulla mobilità urbana. Tajani ha sottolineato che la dichiarazione d'intenti tra le due compagnie "rappresenta un elemento assolutamente positivo perché si rafforzi il tema del trasporto aereo e della competitività delle compagnie aeree nel trasporto mondiale. Mi auguro che si ripeta quanto accaduto con Air France-Klm".

TTGIT.
 
Nota di colore...La statua dell'Ammiraglio Nelson a Trafalgar Square sta' ancora li' a ricordare la memorabile battaglia con L'invicibile Armada!!
Conclusione :- Mi sa' tanto che i Sudditi di Sua maesta' abbiano vinto ancora con questa fusione!!

per la cronaca Nelson combattè a Trafalgar contro i francesi/spagnoli nel 1800 circa, l'Invincibile Armada era un'altra guerra, precedente di circa 200 anni.