Etihad e compagnie aeree nella sua sfera d'influenza


E a proposito delle dichiarazioni del CEO: solo a me suona strano che una compagnia aerea si lamenti del “...collasso del prezzo del greggio...” come causa di perdite economiche?
È come se un contadino dicesse che gli van male gli affari perchè non deve annaffiare.
Oppure questo dimostra ancora una volta che negli EAU le imprese fanno profitti solo col cappio del greggio a danno degli altri...
 
Probabilmente le rotte oil & gas soffrono. Anche con BA rotte tipo IAH, LOS, JED, LAD, BGO, SVG, GYD hanno preso un fracco di legnate e o sono state chiuse o ridotte.
 
http://www.business-standard.com/ar...l-ambani-to-fly-air-india-118041201466_1.html

Gulf airline major Etihad is planning to bid for state-owned carrier Air India. Etihad is looking for partners in major Indian corporate groups and has sent feelers to Anil Ambani-owned Reliance group (ADAG).

The Union government has invited expression of interest from private players to buy 76 per cent in the national carrier. The sale includes 100 per cent in subsidiary Air India Express and 50 per cent in ground handling joint venture AISATS.


Sources aware of the discussions said talks were at a preliminary stage. “Etihad is scouting for partners to form a consortium to bid for Air India and is in discussion with companies, including the Anil Ambani group,” a source said. There are chances that the talks may not translate into a partnership, but this indicates interest of foreign aviation firms and India Inc in the airline.

According to sources close to the transactions, several global airline majors such as British Airways and Singapore Airlines are evaluating investment prospects in Air India and looking for suitable partnership for the deal.

If the partnership works, this will be Etihad’s second investment in an Indian airline.

In 2007, it had bought 24 per cent stake in private airline Jet Airways.
 
E a proposito delle dichiarazioni del CEO: solo a me suona strano che una compagnia aerea si lamenti del “...collasso del prezzo del greggio...” come causa di perdite economiche?
È come se un contadino dicesse che gli van male gli affari perchè non deve annaffiare.
Oppure questo dimostra ancora una volta che negli EAU le imprese fanno profitti solo col cappio del greggio a danno degli altri...

Probabilmente le rotte oil & gas soffrono. Anche con BA rotte tipo IAH, LOS, JED, LAD, BGO, SVG, GYD hanno preso un fracco di legnate e o sono state chiuse o ridotte.

Oltre alle rotte Oil & Gas anche l'economia di Abu Dahbi non può che risentire del basso prezzo del petrolio.
Inoltre, nel caso fossero vere le accuse delle US3 circa gli aiuti di stato alle ME3, la riduzione del prezzo del petrolio potrebbe aver abbassato il differenziale di costo del carburante fra EY e le sue concorrenti.
 
Probabilmente le rotte oil & gas soffrono. Anche con BA rotte tipo IAH, LOS, JED, LAD, BGO, SVG, GYD hanno preso un fracco di legnate e o sono state chiuse o ridotte.

Grazie, ci sta.
Ma fino ad affossare una compagnia del calibro di EY? E perchè allora QR e EK non le han prese le legnate alla stessa maniera?
Management...
 
EY é più piccola, se hanno un contratto con, metti, Shell BP e questi tagliano di brutto lo sentiranno di più di EK, che mi sembra la meno dipendente dall'Oil&Gas, e QR, che (ma é la mia opinione e basta) mi sa che non é "in the business of making money".
 
Dear Mr XXXX,

Unfortunately, I have to inform you that I had to close down the business operations of topbonus Ltd. as a precautionary measure. The reason for this is, that the investor has not yet been able to raise the necessary financing to continue business operations.

Before signing the purchase agreement, the investor had presented a letter-of-credit issued by a reputable bank for a double-digit million euro amount. After the contract had been signed, however, the bank apparently withdrew the letter-of-credit. I was not informed about this issue and the investor only admitted after repeated requests that he is unable to pay.

Although the investor still has a few days to make the outstanding payments, this is unlikely to happen. Moreover, there has been no other prospective buyer to date. Insolvency law provides in such a case for the mandatory closure of business operations in order not to harm creditors by continuing the business without any prospects of success.

The planned restructuring of topbonus based on an insolvency plan is not possible without the confirmed financing of the investor. The insolvency court has already cancelled the discussion- and voting appointment for the insolvency plan.

As the insolvency plan, which I had prepared, can no longer be implemented, thus the restructuring of topbonus via insolvency plan proceedings cannot be continued at the moment. Subsequently, the insolvency proceedings will continue as a regular liquidation process. Earning and redeeming miles remains suspended. The topbonus website will be taken offline soon.

Yours sincerely,

Christian Otto
Insolvency administrator

http://en.topbonus.de/web/
 
Air Serbia's passenger share tumbles

Air Serbia has seen its passenger share at Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport decline during the first quarter after rolling out a set of unpopular cost cutting measures and reducing its number of flights. According to Belgrade Airport's quarterly report, the Serbian carrier recorded a passenger share of just 40%, well down from over 47% registered last year. Although not indicated in the report, the airline's passenger numbers are believed to have fallen some 12% from 453.859 during Q1 2017, which was its busiest first quarter since the airline was relaunched in 2013. Over the January - March period of this year, Air Serbia operated some 5.800 flights, down 8% on 2017. At the same time, foreign carriers maintaining services to Belgrade grew their passenger share to 60% and accounted for 51% of all flight operations.

The future operator of Belgrade Airport, VINCI, has said it anticipates for Air Serbia to hold a passenger share of between 40% - 46% on an annual level. The company is facing headwinds and intense competition, in particular from low cost carriers that are increasingly moving in on routes which were previously solely operated by the national airline. In 2017 it faced no competition on 21 scheduled routes, down from 26 the year before. Lately, it has been directly challenged on a number of its services including Amsterdam, Prague, Malta, Larnaca and Tel Aviv. This list will soon grow to include Berlin. Air Serbia recently warned that a "flood of low cost carriers" would enter its home market in the near future.

The airline is also facing growing indirect competition from low cost carriers at Niš Airport in the country's south-east. Last year, just over 7% of all passengers departing Constantine the Great Airport hailed either from Belgrade or the northern province of Vojvodina. Meanwhile, Wizz Air will commence operations from Vienna to Niš this November with its 220-seat Airbus A321 aircraft, further challenging both the Serbian and Austrian national carriers which maintain services between Belgrade and Vienna. Over the past five months, Air Serbia has transitioned into a hybrid full fare - low cost carrier, which has been largely met by a negative response from the flying public. The airline's CEO, Duncan Naysmith, recently said, “Technology has completely transformed the way people travel in the 21st century, and the ability to have a tailor-made travel experience has been central in this process. Measures, such as unbundling air fares, has enabled Air Serbia to better compete and offer more value, while retaining all its differentiating hallmarks, including the fact that we fly to primary airports, run a frequent flyer program, operate a Premium Lounge, provide seamless codeshare flight options through Belgrade and much more”.

http://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/05/air-serbias-passenger-share-tumbles.html

G
 
Feci una KUL da AUH a fine Aprile A bordo eravamo in economy in 32 pax.. un lago di sangue quel volo. A/M 330
 
A parte l'apertura di BCN, Airlineroute riporta riduzioni e cancellazioni in quantità.

Etihad W18 service changes as of 05JUN18

By Jim Liu
Posted6 June 2018 03:30

Etihad during Tuesday’s schedule update filed additional changes to its planned operation for winter 2018/19 season, including changes in effect from 01OCT18.

Abu Dhabi – Dhaka eff 01OCT18 1 daily service cancelled, currently served by 777-300ER
Abu Dhabi – Los Angeles eff 28OCT18 Reduce from 4 to 3 weekly for winter season, 777-300ER operating
Abu Dhabi – New York JFK eff 01OCT18 Reduce from 2 to 1 daily, EY103/102 cancelled. A380 operating
Abu Dhabi – Paris CDG eff 01OCT18 EY037/038 operated by A380, replacing A330-300/777-300ER (Overall 2 daily A380 service)

Previously reported changes:
Abu Dhabi – Barcelona eff 21NOV18 New route, A330-200 operating following frequency:
21NOV18 – 16DEC18 Day x24
17DEC18 – 13JAN19 Daily
14JAN19 – 20JAN19 Day x4
21JAN19 – 24FEB18 Day x24
25FEB19 – 03MAR19 Daily
04MAR19 – 30MAR19 Day x24
eff 31MAR19 Daily

Abu Dhabi – Colombo eff 28OCT18 Reduce from 2 to 1 daily, A321 operating
Abu Dhabi – Edinburgh eff 01OCT18 5 weekly service cancelled
Abu Dhabi – Kathmandu eff 01DEC18 Reduce from 2 to 1 daily, A320 operating
Abu Dhabi – Kuala Lumpur 19NOV18 – 19DEC18 777-300ER replaces A330-200, 1 daily
Abu Dhabi – Perth eff 01OCT18 1 daily service cancelled