AA, DL e UA protestano contro vettori Qatar & UAE per concorrenza sleale


Mentre prosegue lo scontro con le compagnie del golfo, si apre il fronte cinese

I Vettori Usa rompono le trattative con la Cina sugli Open skies

Si apre un nuovo fronte di scontro per le compagnie aeree nordamericane.

Dopo la battaglia in corso con i vettori del Golfo è ora la volta della Cina. Gli Stati Uniti hanno infatti interrotto le trattative in corso per una maggiore liberalizzazione dei collegamenti tra i due Paesi in considerazione dell’aumento della domanda sulle tratte disponibili.

L’accusa delle major è di avere avuto una disponibilità di slot molto limitata, concentrata solo su pochi aeroporti già congestionati e con orari poco appetibili. Una forma di protezionismo, è il teorema delle compagnie americane, a tutto vantaggio dei big dei cieli cinesi. Secondo alcuni esperti allo stato attuale difficilmente sarà possibile realizzare un accordo di open skies tra le parti. TTG
 
The Abu Dhabi government last year injected $2.5 billion into Etihad Airways, new funding that critics say proves the Persian Gulf carrier is unfairly subsidized by the state in violation of air treaties with the U.S. government.

The previously undisclosed cash injection is detailed in state-owned Etihad’s financial statements, which were made public on Monday by the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies, a lobby group led by the three biggest U.S. airlines.

The group, which includes several labor unions and U.S. carriers American Airlines Group Inc., AAL -1.05 % United Continental Holdings Inc. UAL 7.05 % and Delta Air Lines Inc., DAL 0.18 % is pushing the U.S. government to limit the rapid growth of Etihad and its regional peers, Dubai’s Emirates Airline and Doha-based Qatar Airways.

Etihad reported a net profit of $73 million last year on revenue of $5.86 billion, according to the airline’s financial statements, which are audited by KPMG LLP. Earnings were boosted by a one-off sale of a subsidiary to another part of the group for $700 million.

“Etihad’s own financials prove that it is not a commercially viable enterprise and owes its continued existence to massive government subsidies from the United Arab Emirates,” said Jill Zuckman, chief spokesperson for the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies.

Etihad’s 2014 net was $73 million. A representative for Etihad said the airline had never hid receiving equity capital and loans from the Abu Dhabi government.

“That is completely normal for any business which has significant long-term capital commitments, for example for aircraft deposits,” the Etihad representative said. “These issues have all been addressed in our submission to the U.S. government.”

The group submitted Etihad’s financial statements as part of its latest legal submission to the U.S. government as part of its effort to prove the Gulf carriers harm U.S. airlines’ operations.

Etihad’s documents were filed by the airline to a corporate registry in Hong Kong last month and were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The big three U.S. passenger carriers in January asked the U.S. government to renegotiate air treaties with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, where Emirates and Etihad are based. They allege the three state-owned Gulf airlines have received more than $40 billion in government subsidies since 2004 that allow the carriers to unfairly compete in the aviation market.


U.S. Airlines Battling Gulf Carriers Cite Others’ Experience (March 16)Big U.S. Airlines Fault Persian Gulf Carriers (Feb. 5)Emirates, Etihad and Qatar Make Their Move on the U.S. (Nov. 6, 2014).The U.S. Transportation, State and Commerce departments said they would review the allegations and opened regulatory dockets where any party could file information and lobby for either side.

Emirates, Etihad and Qatar have dismissed the U.S. carriers’ claims, denied they are unfairly subsidized and filed rebuttals on the U.S. dockets.

FedEx Corp. FDX -0.35 % ’s FedEx Express delivery unit, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc., AAWW 0.95 % JetBlue Airways Corp. JBLU -0.38 % and Hawaiian Holdings Inc. HA 0.61 % ’s Hawaiian Airlines have also said they oppose the big three U.S. carriers’ submissions to the U.S. government.

The Abu Dhabi government’s latest capital injection came as Etihad invested hundreds of millions of dollars in other carriers around the world, according to the airline’s financial statements.

It wasn’t immediately clear how the latest government funds were used, and Etihad declined to comment.

Etihad has minority equity stakes in eight airlines, and supports the carriers through investment in their loyalty programs, bonds and operations. It paid $543 million for a 49% stake in Italy’s Alitalia and bought perpetual bonds valued at $399 million issued by Germany’s Air Berlin AB1 2.04 % PLC. It also spent $150 million on a 50% interest in Jet Airways (India) Ltd. EQJETAIRWAYS -1.09 % ’s loyalty program.

The strategy has helped the airline, the smallest of the three Persian Gulf carriers, to achieve scale globally in markets where aviation rights are restricted or the carrier has faced fierce competition, particularly from its regional peers seeking to funnel traffic through their hubs.

The U.S. government has negotiated 117 “open skies” treaties with countries since 1992, allowing airlines from both sides to access any airport in both countries.

Write to Rory Jones at rory.jones@wsj.com
 
Etihad expands US management team amid subsidies row

Geert Boven, Etihad Airways’ Senior Vice President, Airport Services, said the “appointments will further ensure the continued growth and success of our US operations”.
The appointments comes as Etihad, along with Qatar Airways and Dubai's Emirates Airline, are embroiled in an ongoing dispute over alleged subsides that are claimed to be in breach of open skies agreements.
The US carriers, and their unions, say the Middle Eastern airlines have received $42 billion in subsidies from their home governments over the past decade. That, the US airlines say, violates aviation agreements the United States has signed with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
The Gulf carriers deny that they are subsidised.
Last week, the US Justice Department antitrust officials raised concerns about the demands by US airlines that the government limit flights of three Middle Eastern rivals to the US, warning that there would be higher fares and fewer choices for consumers if the Obama administration blocks new flights by Emirates, Etihad Airways and Qatar Airways.
Etihad Airways has boosted its US managament team with the announcement of two key appointments, as the subsidies row with legacy carriers continues.
The appointment of Omar Al Memari as airport manager at San Francisco International Airport and Khaled Al Mazrouei as assistant airport manager at Los Angeles International Airport also marks the airline’s seventh Emirati airport manager and fourth Emirati assistant airport manager appointments in the company’s history.
The Abu Dhabi-based now has more than 190 UAE nationals appointed as leaders at airport destinations across the world.
San Francisco and Los Angeles are seen as critical destinations for the airline’s extensive global network, where the airline offers daily nonstop service to and from Abu Dhabi – and on to the world.

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/etihad-expands-us-management-team-amid-subsidies-row-609410.html
 
Etihad expands US management team amid subsidies row

Geert Boven, Etihad Airways’ Senior Vice President, Airport Services, said the “appointments will further ensure the continued growth and success of our US operations”.
The appointments comes as Etihad, along with Qatar Airways and Dubai's Emirates Airline, are embroiled in an ongoing dispute over alleged subsides that are claimed to be in breach of open skies agreements.
The US carriers, and their unions, say the Middle Eastern airlines have received $42 billion in subsidies from their home governments over the past decade. That, the US airlines say, violates aviation agreements the United States has signed with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
The Gulf carriers deny that they are subsidised.
Last week, the US Justice Department antitrust officials raised concerns about the demands by US airlines that the government limit flights of three Middle Eastern rivals to the US, warning that there would be higher fares and fewer choices for consumers if the Obama administration blocks new flights by Emirates, Etihad Airways and Qatar Airways.
Etihad Airways has boosted its US managament team with the announcement of two key appointments, as the subsidies row with legacy carriers continues.
The appointment of Omar Al Memari as airport manager at San Francisco International Airport and Khaled Al Mazrouei as assistant airport manager at Los Angeles International Airport also marks the airline’s seventh Emirati airport manager and fourth Emirati assistant airport manager appointments in the company’s history.
The Abu Dhabi-based now has more than 190 UAE nationals appointed as leaders at airport destinations across the world.
San Francisco and Los Angeles are seen as critical destinations for the airline’s extensive global network, where the airline offers daily nonstop service to and from Abu Dhabi – and on to the world.

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/etihad-expands-us-management-team-amid-subsidies-row-609410.html

quindi la risposta e' nell'invasione ?? :)
 
UNITED Ends Kuwait / Bahrain Service from mid-Jan 2016

UNITED is adjusting its operation to the Middle East, as it closed reservation for Washington Dulles – Kuwait City – Bahrain route. Reservation for travel on/after 13JAN16 (US departure) is no longer available.

The Star Alliance member currently operates this route 4 times a week, with 777-200ER.

UA982 IAD2140 – 1755+1KWI1910+1 – 2020+1BAH 777 x247
UA981 BAH2215 – 2325KWI0110+1 – 0705+1IAD 777 x135

airlineroute
 
Un articolo che si puo' bollare come fazioso dopo aver letto le prime 10 righe... vale la pena leggerlo tutto?

Edit: Boh, sono curioso di sapere che sussidi ha preso il Rob per mettere insieme quell'articolo.
 
Managing Director, Advertising
American Airlines
October 1987 – December 2006 (19 years 3 months)Fort Worth, Texas USA
I completed a long career at American as leader of the Advertising team, responsible for brand development, media advertising, direct marketing, sales promotion, and customer research. I was part of the team that rebuilt the AA brand after September 11. Prior to that, I held leadership positions in corporate communications, food and beverage services, and international affairs.

LOL vabbe' questione chiusa.
 
Si e' schierata in maniera netta anche Air Canada


Air Canada: We will oppose more fligths for Emirates, Etihad


Air Canada started services to Dubai on Wednesday, five years after a diplomatic spat between the UAE and Canada over flights

Dubai: Air Canada will oppose any moves by Canada’s new Liberal government to grant more flights to Emirates and Etihad Airways, a senior Air Canada executive told Gulf News on Thursday, a day after the airline started flights to Dubai.
“There is enough capacity … between the two markets,” Duncan Bureau, Vice President of Global Sales at Air Canada said in an interview.
The number flights between the UAE and Canada has long been a disdain for Emirates and Etihad, who want more access beyond the three weekly flights they are each allowed to operate to Toronto.
Canada’s October 19 election that saw the Justin Trudeau-led Liberal party voted into government has raised hopes the two countries will be able renegotiate the allocation. UAE General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) Director General, Saif Mohammad Al Suwaidi, told Gulf News on October 22 that he plans to discuss “the requirements of our carriers” with the new government.
But Bureau said Air Canada will “absolutely” make sure Canada’s new government knows it opposes any more flights for the UAE carriers. “The capacity that is currently being deployed is more than adequate to service the true demand,” he said.
Tensions over the flights broiled over in 2010 with Canada losing its military base in the UAE and visa restrictions being imposed on Canadians. The diplomatic spat was widely perceived to have ended in 2013 when the two countries’ Foreign Ministers met in Abu Dhabi and the visa restrictions were lifted.
Air Canada started three weekly flights to Dubai on Wednesday with the airline flying a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner to Dubai International for the first time ever. Brunei flag carrier Royal Brunei has flown the smaller 787-8 to Dubai since 2013.
Bureau said the airline expects to make return on invested capital “north of 15 per cent” on the Toronto-Dubai route.
Air Canada is hopeful 20 to 30 per cent of passengers on the route will be from hub traffic feeding from cities across Canada and second tier American cities like Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Denver. The UAE is home to an estimated 40,000 Canadians.


http://gulfnews.com/business/aviati...se-more-fligths-for-emirates-etihad-1.1614329
 
Si e' schierata in maniera netta anche Air Canada


Air Canada: We will oppose more fligths for Emirates, Etihad


Air Canada started services to Dubai on Wednesday, five years after a diplomatic spat between the UAE and Canada over flights

Dubai: Air Canada will oppose any moves by Canada’s new Liberal government to grant more flights to Emirates and Etihad Airways, a senior Air Canada executive told Gulf News on Thursday, a day after the airline started flights to Dubai.
“There is enough capacity … between the two markets,” Duncan Bureau, Vice President of Global Sales at Air Canada said in an interview.
The number flights between the UAE and Canada has long been a disdain for Emirates and Etihad, who want more access beyond the three weekly flights they are each allowed to operate to Toronto.
Canada’s October 19 election that saw the Justin Trudeau-led Liberal party voted into government has raised hopes the two countries will be able renegotiate the allocation. UAE General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) Director General, Saif Mohammad Al Suwaidi, told Gulf News on October 22 that he plans to discuss “the requirements of our carriers” with the new government.
But Bureau said Air Canada will “absolutely” make sure Canada’s new government knows it opposes any more flights for the UAE carriers. “The capacity that is currently being deployed is more than adequate to service the true demand,” he said.
Tensions over the flights broiled over in 2010 with Canada losing its military base in the UAE and visa restrictions being imposed on Canadians. The diplomatic spat was widely perceived to have ended in 2013 when the two countries’ Foreign Ministers met in Abu Dhabi and the visa restrictions were lifted.
Air Canada started three weekly flights to Dubai on Wednesday with the airline flying a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner to Dubai International for the first time ever. Brunei flag carrier Royal Brunei has flown the smaller 787-8 to Dubai since 2013.
Bureau said the airline expects to make return on invested capital “north of 15 per cent” on the Toronto-Dubai route.
Air Canada is hopeful 20 to 30 per cent of passengers on the route will be from hub traffic feeding from cities across Canada and second tier American cities like Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Denver. The UAE is home to an estimated 40,000 Canadians.


http://gulfnews.com/business/aviati...se-more-fligths-for-emirates-etihad-1.1614329
Fra Canada ed Emirati ci fu una dura battaglia commerciale alcuni anni fa con il Canada che non concesse frequenze aggiuntive a EK e gli Emirati che boicottarono Blackbarry per rivalsa.
 
Schermaglie tra DL e QR ad Atlanta:

World’s Busiest Airport Couldn’t Give A Gate For Qatar Airways

2016-06-06

Over 500 passengers aboard the first Qatar Airways direct flight from Doha to Atlanta on a super jumbo A380 faced inconvenience as they got caught up in an international rivalry between airline heavyweights.

When Qatar Airways Flight 755 flew over 12,000 km from Doha, Qatar’s capital, and landed at Atlanta airport, the world’s busiest, a gate for the double-decker jet could not be provided, US media reports said.

That forced the 517 passengers on Qatar Airways to deplane on Wednesday via mobile stairs and shuttle buses. Atlanta’s airport has only one gate that can accommodate the A380 – the world’s largest airliner.

The airport and resident hub carrier Delta Air Lines said they could not make that gate available for Qatar Airways.


“The very public battle between Delta Air Lines, the world’s second largest airline, and competitor Qatar Airways represents a microcosm of the national debate over whether the amount of alleged government subsidies foreign airlines receive violates international Open Skies agreements,” CNN commented.

The Atlanta airport and Delta blamed Qatar Airways for not giving enough notice that it was sending a Super Jumbo to an airport with only one gate that could handle such a big plane, the report said: “It is a part of the common use lease agreement that we have,” said airport spokesman Reese McCranie. “We have to be given a certain amount of time when there is an equipment swap.”

Four to six Delta aircraft needed access to the A380 gate at the time the Qatar Airways plane requested access.

“… there wasn’t anywhere Delta could put them,” he added. Delta offered as a “solution” a scenario that included parking the A380 on a remote stand near the international terminal.


“Delta applies for accommodations months in advance,” a Delta spokeswoman said. “Qatar did not do that when asking for the A380.”

When asked if the airline gave enough notice to schedule access to the gate, Gunter Saurwein, Qatar Airways’ vice president for the Americas, smiled and said, “In general yes, we gave some lead time that we would be here.”

When asked if Delta may have deliberately prevented Qatar from using the gate, Sawrwein said, “I do not want to comment on that. We as an airline don’t finger point.”

Later, the outbound A380 flight also experienced a two hour delay due to the same gate situation, the CNN reported. US carriers claim that Qatar Airways and other Persian Gulf airlines receive billions of dollars in subsidies and have done so for many years.

While Delta accuses Qatar of improperly using subsidies to fund new routes, many argue that Qatar offers passengers a higher quality experience at a more competitive price.

The feud between the two carriers escalated last March when Qatar Airways CEO Akbar Al Baker said he had launched the Atlanta route “to rub salt into the wounds of Delta.”

Source: ndtv.com
https://aviationvoice.com/worlds-bu...email&utm_campaign=explore_the_aviation_world
 
Con l'apertura della ATH-JFK di EK le US3 tornano all'attacco, sembra in maniera ancora piu' decisa adesso. Effetto Trump?
In questa nota, critica nei confronti di quanto affermato da James Hogan circa l'impegno di non volare su altre destinazioni USA, la Partnership for Open and Fair Skies sottolinea che l'apertura da parte di EK della ATH NYC e' in violazione degli stessi accordi Open Skies.

http://www.openandfairskies.com/pre...s-etihads-misleading-announcement-u-s-growth/

"...In fact, for every international flight that U.S. airlines are forced to close due to subsidy-fueled Gulf carrier expansion, economists estimate that over 1,500 American jobs are lost...."
 
curiosità...ma di che si lamentano? Nessuno vola/volava non-stop su ATH
 
curiosità...ma di che si lamentano? Nessuno vola/volava non-stop su ATH

Invece UA e DL operano seasonal MAY-SEP ATH NYC , cio' a causa della scarsa domanda all year round; e gia' cosi' e' difficile a causa del perdurare della congiuntura greca.
E' chiaro che EK con il suo 77W andra' a ricreare la stessa overcapacity attuale sulla MIL-NYC, con ennesimo dumping che a sua volta rendera' lo yield non profittevole.
Senso della 5th liberty su una rotta gia' operata da due vettori, dove il mercato non chiede e non offre la copertura year round?
Ma sappiamo che di fare revenue a EK non interessa, loro giocano a Air-Risiko e vogliono solo vedere il loro logo sull' intero cartellone...
 
Ma sappiamo che di fare revenue a EK non interessa, loro giocano a Air-Risiko e vogliono solo vedere il loro logo sull' intero cartellone...

E invece UA che è stata la prima a sparare tariffe a 1$ più le tasse sul nord atlantico non fa dumping?

A me questo "chiagni e fotti" americano stanca veramente. Lo fa Boeing, lo fanno le compagnie aeree, ma la realtà è che nessuno è innocente. Se ciò che fanno le ME3 è contrario alla concorrenza, che le si porti davanti al WTO e vediamo che succede.
 
E invece UA che è stata la prima a sparare tariffe a 1$ più le tasse sul nord atlantico non fa dumping?

A me questo "chiagni e fotti" americano stanca veramente. Lo fa Boeing, lo fanno le compagnie aeree, ma la realtà è che nessuno è innocente. Se ciò che fanno le ME3 è contrario alla concorrenza, che le si porti davanti al WTO e vediamo che succede.

+1. Se le statunitensi provassero a spendere un po' dei soldi usati per il lobbying nel migliorare l'esperienza di viaggio dei passeggeri, saremmo più contenti tutti.