Ryanair cancella 7 tratte da Londra Stansted ma conferma Genova


goafan

Utente Registrato
Ryanair blames UK tax for cutbacks

RYANAIR has blamed air travel taxes for its decision to cut capacity by 17 per cent and axe seven routes from London's Stansted airport.

The budget carrier said that moving aircraft to parts of Europe that have scrapped air travel taxes would result in 2.5 million fewer passengers using Stansted.

The northern winter fleet at Stansted will now be just 22 planes, down from 24 last winter and 28 the year before.

The summer to winter reduction in fleet size will be even more dramatic as Ryanair normally operates 39 aircraft from the airport during the busiest months. The airline will also cut capacity at Luton airport by 15 per cent.

Michael O'Leary said that air passenger duty, which is added to ticket prices, was a self-defeating tax as it put off visitors.

He said a similar tax in Ireland had raised €80 million ($115m) a year but the country had lost €300m in sales taxes from reduced visitor numbers.

The UK government has proposed changing the tax so it applies per aircraft rather than per passenger, but the level of tax each individual pays is expected to stay the same.

The Netherlands and Belgium have scrapped their equivalents to increase tourist numbers, while Spain and Greece have also suspended their taxes.

"We have got to persuade the government that the way forward is not APD," Mr O'Leary said. "The way forward for the British economy and British jobs is lower access costs, otherwise people will go to other countries."

Ryanair will stop flights from Stansted to Friedrichshafen, Genoa, Granada, Jerez, Katowice and Reus this winter. It will reduce the number of flights it operates to Cork, Dublin, Vasteras, Lourdes, Milan, Pescara and Riga.

Ryanair also cut capacity at Stansted last year by 14 per cent and Mr O'Leary warned that he would continue to take flights out of the airport if high taxes and landing charges were not reversed.

"The government says people don't mind paying an extra tenner for their flight, but if that was true I'd have it off them long before the government got up in the morning," he said.

The budget carrier is also lobbying the European Commission to limit the amount of compensation it has to pay for cancelled flights after volcanic ash disruption earlier this year cost it €50m.

One man who paid €30 for his flight is claiming €3500 in extra expenses.

More than 1.5 million Ryanair passengers were affected by the ash cloud and 1.1 million have been given refunds. A further 100,000 have received compensation for hotel and food bills run up while waiting for flights to depart.

Mr O'Leary said an EU rule that requires airlines to give compensation to stranded passengers was unfair. He is proposing changes to prevent airlines facing unlimited liabilities in such situations. He also wants a cap on compensation so the amount paid reflects the amount the ticket was bought for, as applies to train and ferry journeys.

Ryanair also said that it was seeking compensation after British and European airspace was shut for six days in April because of volcanic ash from Iceland.

Mr O'Leary has written to the Civil Aviation Authority, the Met Office and the Department for Transport to establish which organisation gave the order to ground his flights.

"We are trying to find out who closed the airspace so we can sue them but nobody wants to own up to who is responsible," he said.

www.theaustralian.com.au

CIAO
_goa
 
Ryanair will stop flights from Stansted to Friedrichshafen, Genoa, Granada, Jerez, Katowice and Reus this winter. It will reduce the number of flights it operates to Cork, Dublin, Vasteras, Lourdes, Milan, Pescara and Riga.

Da mò che sono state sospese STN-FDH e STN-GRX !
 
Confermo, erano 4 frequenze daily + il volo su Luton

Si è spesso parlato che la Milano-Londra (tutti gli aeroporti) è in sovracapacità ma mai avrei pensato che quella costratta a cedere e ridurre le frequenze fosse Ryanair....
Invece ultimamente le major specie BA e LHI da MXP fanno prezzi da low cost con servizio completo e arrivano comodamente a LHR, con queste offerte ormai volare a STN con FR non ha piu' molto senso, a conti fatti spesso si spende meno con una major.
Per lo stesso discorso unito al caos operativo di questi ultimi mesi non mi stupirei di vedere presto una riduzione di frequenze anche di Easyjet sulla MXP-LGW, i pax business su questa rotta stanno ormai abbandonando Easyjet a piu' non posso.
 
Si ma riduce solo il Sabato e la Domenica lasciando un volo mattutino e uno serale. Cesare come sai bene chi fa i weekend non va o torna a metà pomeriggio! La mossa direi ha senso.

LHR o LGW in termine di comodità è identico o quasi! Anzi io preferisco LGW, si esce prima, si cammina meno e c'è meno chaos!
 
LHR o LGW in termine di comodità è identico o quasi! Anzi io preferisco LGW, si esce prima, si cammina meno e c'è meno chaos!

Può essere vero, ma ormai a partecipare al volo lotteria di Easyjet (non sai se parti e quando arrivi) non mi interessa, tanto piu' che spesso a conti fatti costa meno BA o LHI.
 
Tutto sommato per alcune zone anche tra STN e LHR non è che ci sia un abisso in termini di comodità di accesso.
Comunque sarà anche in sovracapacità la direttrice MIL-LON, ma i prezzi non sono mai bassi e gli aerei sempre pieni...GOA invece credo soffra, soprattutto per quanto riguarda l'inverno, la concorrenza di PSA che ha voli in orari decisamente più comodi sia per andare che per tornare.
 
Comunque sarà anche in sovracapacità la direttrice MIL-LON, ma i prezzi non sono mai bassi e gli aerei sempre pieni.

Voli BA one way da 49 euro, LHI one way da 38 euro per volare a LHR con un servizio completo non mi sembrano affatto prezzi cari.
 
Ultima modifica: