Marito scrive al CEO Cathay chiedendo di far smettere i piloti di farsi sua moglie AV


E' ovviamente colpa dei piloti, non di sua moglie che è leggermente zoc**** :)
 
From:****************@gmail.com
To: wangchangshun@airchina.com; john_slosar@cathaypacific.com
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:40 PM
Subject: Complaint against Alex Roels (CX Senior First Officer) for having sex with my wife Eden Lo (盧穎盈) 投訴國泰員工通姦 / 性行為

Dear esteemed Deputy Chairman Wang and CEO Slosar,

Can you please let me know whether the following and attached matters are being looked into?

Thanks,

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Mr. Chen wrote:

Dear Management, Customer Relations, and all relevant parties who may offer help,

It is quite surprising that with nearly three months, Cathay Appeasing continues to condone sex between married CX employees (Alex Roels and Eden Lo) during work (a potential public flight safety issue) and inter-office adultery leveraging CX assets.

With nearly two months of “investigation,” the lawyer who represents Cathay Appeasing, a listed company, not only addressed the incorrect individual (I am not Mr. Yen but Mr. Chen) but also got the facts incorrect (two and not one CX employees are involved; you need two public to have sexual intercourse). Given such sloppy responses filled with inconsistencies, the customer received no apology from Cathay Appeasing and is threatened continuously.

At the very least, question Mr. Roels to stop having sex with my wife. Given such a senior position within CX, shouldn’t CX expect him to behave professionally and morally at all times? As his conducts represents Cathay Appeasing whereas given Eden’s relatively low corporate rank, she may be excused due to lack of encounter and / or dread of authority from public of Mr. Roels’ position.

Also, according to my wife, CX pilots are promiscuous with CX flight attendants (so-called “crew meals”; a term earlier foreign to me as I have never worked in the airline industry), hence the recent CX sex scandals? I don’t know here are more… The fact that Mr. Roels is not wearing a condom when having sex with my wife in addition to the promiscuity my wife mentioned mean that Mr. Roels could potentially pose as a health hazard among female CX flight attendants as well. Again, I have never worked in the airline industry; thus all my information comes from my wife.
I have already given a few examples of their leveraging CX assets to conduct adultery with dates and locations in my before emails. If Cathay Appeasing does perform a comprehensive investigation, it can easily find out more instances; I do not reckon it is necessary for me to provide more explicit evidences to Cathay Appeasing at this point in time.

Any coordination in lies further confirms the deepness of their relationship. It is apt clear why both CX employees do not mind resorting to dishonesty because it seems Cathay Appeasing is openly condoning married CX employees to leverage CX assets for adultery / sex while covering their acts with coordinated lies (all of these according to Mr. Y.S. Cheung are “private affair of an employee”). None of the above violates any internal code of conduct (which should include “morality” and “integrity”). I do not reckon this sets a moral precedence for the rest of Cathay Appeasing and a excellent public image.

The aforementioned can be backed up with evidences when necessary. It is now nearly three months since I first contacted Cathay Appeasing and not anything has been done additional than using a lawyer to threaten the victim with legal jargons interspersed with spelling / grammar errors, inconsistencies and incorrect facts. I marvel what the public will reckon of such contact from Cathay Appeasing…

I will take up again to pursue the issue until CX provides a honest solution and clear explanation, and I set aside my rights to contact anyone who may offer any help in the matter.


fonte: vr-zone.com
 
Dall'articolo sembra che il problema non sia il fatto che il povero estensore abbia in testa piú steccati che un recinto di montagna, ma il fatto che il pilota in questione abbia rapporti sessuali non protetti con alcune AV. Come dire: "fattela pure, non mi offendo! ma per favore metti il preservativo".
L'altro problema sarebbe la sicurezza del volo ...... a meno che anche l'autopilota non abbia cercato di possedere la "vittima", a voi il giudizio ...... :D
 
il commento piu' carino dal thread citato era:

this is what she would think:
"i'm overseas, alone in 5 star hotel room, air con damn cold, i can't possibly just watch tv, from the plane, to immigration, taxi/coach, hotel lobby, there were at least 100 guys want to nail me , i 'm so flattered, i wish i could give it to them all, but the most i can take 2 because i have a flight to catch...best part is , no one know me here"

interessante capire perche' questo tipo ha fatto questo gran casino, anziche' chiedere un semplice divorzio. Non mi sembra che la sua storia andra' avanti a lungo... :-)
 
il commento piu' carino dal thread citato era:

this is what she would think:
"i'm overseas, alone in 5 star hotel room, air con damn cold, i can't possibly just watch tv, from the plane, to immigration, taxi/coach, hotel lobby, there were at least 100 guys want to nail me , i 'm so flattered, i wish i could give it to them all, but the most i can take 2 because i have a flight to catch...best part is , no one know me here"

interessante capire perche' questo tipo ha fatto questo gran casino, anziche' chiedere un semplice divorzio. Non mi sembra che la sua storia andra' avanti a lungo... :-)

questo è il meglio....
 
Non faceva prima a parlare con la moglie? :D

se la moglie è quella della foto che hanno pubblicato i giornali di hong khong ... diciamo che ... non riusciva proprio a parlare in quel momento.

80-cathay-pacific-cockpit-sex-scandal.jpg
 
Questo e' proprio un farlocco. Si potrebbe fare le mogli dei piloti che si fanno sua moglie e si lamenta. :-)
 
I pax, per usufruire delle funzioni avanzate di CX, devono avere un mile status elevato :D