United-Jetblue

herry92 ha detto:

United e Jetblue diventano sorelle: nasce l’alleanza Blue Sky​

Un’alleanza trasversale. O, forse, il primo passo di JetBlue (che non fa parte di alcuna alleanza) verso un ingresso in Star Alliance. E’ l’accordo che la quarta compagnia aerea americana per passeggeri trasportati ha stretto con United Airlines. Sfruttando il nome dell’una e i colori predominanti della livrea di entrambe, United e Jetblue hanno chiamato la partnership ‘Blue Sky’.
Prevede uno ‘scambio’ di slot sugli scali newyorkesi di Newark (dove United ne cederà a Jetblue) e di JFK, dove United farà il suo rientro dopo tre anni di assenza (avendo una base enorme a Newark, quello di United con il JFK è sempre stato un matrimonio con separazioni e ritorni di fiamma).

Ma, soprattutto, Blue Sky prevede mutui benefici per gli iscritti ai programmi fedeltà Mileage Plus di United e True Blue di Jetblue, che potranno accumulare e spendere miglia/punti indifferentemente con l’uno e con l’altro, inclusi i voli di lungo raggio di United e quelli per l’Europa di Jetblue.

I membri con status godranno degli stessi privilegi con l’uno e con l’altro vettore per quanto riguarda check-in prioritario, priorità ai controlli di sicurezza, baglio in stiva gratuito, riconsegna prioritaria del bagaglio, scelta dei sedili inclusi quelli extra-legroom e cambi /standby nello stesso giorno.

Infine, una volta avviata la partnership, United e JetBlue lanceranno un accordo di interlinea, vendendo i voli l’una dell’altra tramite i rispettivi siti web e app mobili. Ciò significa che sarà possibile prenotare un volo United sul sito di JetBlue (o viceversa) e connettersi senza interruzioni in un unico itinerario tra le due compagnie aeree.

United e Jetblue diventano sorelle: nasce l'alleanza Blue Sky. E potrebbe interessare anche i passeggeri di ITA

Un'alleanza trasversale. O, forse, il primo passo di JetBlue (che non fa parte di alcuna alleanza) verso un ingresso in Star Alliance. E' l'accordo che la

www.theflightclub.it

Clicca per espandere...

Aggiornamento di ieri, annuncio interno UA: la cosa si fa e smuove equlibri importanti specialmente a NYC:

"We are excited to announce that the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has completed the review of our Blue Sky collaboration with Jet Blue and approved us to proceed to implementation.

We appreciate Secretary Duffy, Assistant Secretary Edwards, and the entire team at the DOT for their review of Blue Sky.

Blue Sky is a new and unique collaboration that gives customers of both airlines even more options to find flights that fit their plans as well as new opportunities to earn and use MileagePlus® miles and TrueBlue points across both airlines. Blue Sky will begin introducing new customer benefits starting this fall, rolling out in phases:

• MileagePlus customers will be able to earn and use miles on most JetBlue flights. JetBlue’s TrueBlue members will be able to earn and use points for flights on our extensive domestic and international network.
• Through a traditional interline agreement, each airline will offer flights on one another’s website and app to make booking across the two airlines’ complementary networks simple and easy.
  
• The benefits of each airline’s loyalty program — priority boarding, complimentary access to preferred and extra legroom seats and same-day standby/switch — will be available when customers travel on the other airline’s aircraft.
  
• JetBlue will provide United access to slots at JFK International Airport for up to seven daily round-trip flights out of JFK Terminal 6 to begin as early as 2027. And, as part of a net-neutral exchange, JetBlue and United will exchange eight flight timings at EWR.
  
• We will move our website and mobile app’s ability to sell hotels, rental cars, cruises and travel insurance, on both a stand-alone and package basis, to new technology and services provided by JetBlue’s Paisly platform.

Stay tuned for more! We will share more details in the coming weeks as implementation of the Blue Sky collaboration begins."

Scott Kirby ieri: "We're pursuing additional JFK slots beyond those expected from JetBlue, with a goal of 20 daily slots."

Brooklyn e Long Island rimangono un focus assolutamente primario come catchment area, cosi come la presenza nei 3 NY apt's che e' fondamentale per essere NY global carrier.

Source : UNITED

Great news for JetBlue and United loyalty members: As part of our Blue Sky collaboration we announced earlier this year, loyalty members of both airlines can now earn and redeem points or miles across each other’s networks.

This milestone delivers our shared vision to create a more rewarding travel experience by giving customers greater flexibility and choice when booking flights with their loyalty currency of choice.

Loyalty earn and redeem across both airlines
Effective today:

• TrueBlue members can earn points and redeem them for flights across United’s global network, including United Express.
• MileagePlus members can earn and redeem miles on most flights across JetBlue’s network of top leisure destinations.1

When searching for flights with points or miles on JetBlue or United’s websites and mobile apps, customers will now see flight options across both airlines’ networks—making it easier than ever to turn everyday travel into meaningful rewards.

To earn miles, points and tiles, TrueBlue members can enter their loyalty number when booking United-operated flights on United.com. Similarly, United MileagePlus members can enter theirs when booking JetBlue-operated flights on JetBlue.com.

To redeem points or miles, members should continue booking award travel directly through their respective airline’s website, selecting the option to search with points or miles.2

“With reciprocal earning and redemption now available, Blue Sky is officially taking flight,” we shared in a joint statement. “We’re excited to give our loyalty members the ability to use the program of their choice when traveling across our complementary networks.”

Still to come from Blue Sky
This is just the beginning of our collaboration. Additional customer benefits will continue rolling out in phases, including:

• Revenue Booking – coming in the first quarter of 2026 – including the ability to book itineraries on either airline using cash or miles/points.
• Reciprocal perks and benefits – coming in early 2026 – such as priority boarding, preferred and extra legroom seating, and same-day standby and flight changes.
• United’s travel extras, MileagePlus Travel, to transition to Paisly, LLC – coming in early 2026 – United’s MileagePlus Travel with expanded options for hotels, rental cars, cruises, packages and travel insurance will be powered by JetBlue’s wholly owned travel product company, Paisly.
• JetBlue’s support for United’s JFK expansion – with access to slots for up to seven daily roundtrips from JetBlue’s new Terminal 6 beginning as early as 2027.

Through these initiatives, Blue Sky aims to create more rewarding, connected and streamlined travel experiences for customers while opening new avenues for growth for both airlines.

1. Some select JetBlue routes are not eligible for MileagePlus accrual and redemption. Available redemption flights will appear on each airline’s booking channels.

2. Redemption seats are capacity-controlled, with limited availability on high demand flights.

londonfog ha detto:

Cesare mi sembra che chiudano rotte per i Caraibi e la Florida, in luglio e agosto è bassa stagione. Non e' cosi' nera come pensi (direi sul grgio molto scuro )

Clicca per espandere...

mmmmm....diciamo che e' un chiaroscuro?
Perche' e' un bel passo indietro da EWR invece, il che lascia ancora piu' spazio di manovra a UA stessa...mentre era partita una certa logica di network-partnership che dava proprio a Caribe e FL aggiunte importanti di opportunita' da EWR, non eccelse per UA.
Poi pero' e' arrivato il collasso di Spirit e si sono aperte le praterie di FLL...dove B6 potrebbe strutturare il suo primo sistema hub-n-spoke, il tutto con prospettive future interessanti; riassunto abbastanza bene qui, nell'articolo di Live and Let's Fly:

JetBlue Retreats From Newark, Making A United Merger Even More Likely​

Matthew Klint Posted onMay 19, 2026 15 Comments

JetBlue is pulling down even more Newark flying, and the message is clear: Newark does not work for JetBlue any more than JFK worked for United. That has implications far beyond a few leisure routes that JetBlue is axing: I sense it is part of a strategy that, at the very least, makes a JetBlue-United merger more tenable.

In This Post:

• JetBlue Pulls Back From Newark, Strengthening The Case For United Tie-Up
  
  • Why Newark Does Not Work For JetBlue
  • United Could Not Make JFK Work Either
  • JetBlue Is Choosing Fort Lauderdale
  • Still, The Newark Pullback Is Awkward
  • This Makes A United – JetBlue Merger More Likely, Not Less
  • Are Consumers Hurt Or Helped By This?
  • CONCLUSION

​

JetBlue is cutting more routes, and Newark (EWR) is taking a particularly hard hit.

The latest reported cuts include Newark service to:

• Aruba (AUA)
• Cancun (CUN)
• Punta Cana (PUJ)
• Santo Domingo (SDQ)
• Tampa (TPA)

JetBlue is also cutting Hartford (BDL) – Tampa, Orlando (MCO) – San José (SJO), Providence (PVD) – San Juan (SJU), and all flights from Manchester, New Hampshire (MHT).

This is the latest sign that JetBlue is moving away from marginal outstations and toward places where it can actually build a defensible network. And Newark, despite being a massive New York-area airport, is not that place for JetBlue.

The problem is that Newark is United’s fortress hub. United has the scale, the corporate contracts, the frequent flyer base, the premium traffic, the lounges, the international network, and the schedule utility to make Newark work.

JetBlue has a nice onboard product, but a nice onboard product is not enough when you are competing against a hub carrier with far more frequency and far more revenue depth.

That is especially true at a high-cost airport like Newark. It is hard to make money flying leisure-heavy routes if the airport cost structure is high and you do not have enough premium or connecting revenue to offset it. A $109 fare to Florida or the Caribbean sounds great to consumers, but if the airport costs, aircraft utilization, crew costs, and competitive pressure are too high, the route does not work.

JetBlue can compete at Newark around the edges, but it cannot even come close to competing with United at Newark.

And that brings us to the obvious comparison.

This is the mirror image of United at JFK.

United repeatedly tried to make JFK work without enough scale. It had premium transcontinental flights. It had brand recognition. It had MileagePlus members who wanted JFK. It had a great product on some routes. But without enough slots, United was always a niche player.

Eventually, United walked away from JFK.

That was painful and arguably strategically shortsighted. But the underlying lesson was clear: in the New York market, being present is not the same thing as being relevant.

United was present at JFK. It was not relevant enough.

JetBlue is present at Newark. It is not relevant enough.

That is why these Newark cuts make sense.

In this case, it’s not like JetBlue is simply sinking. As Cranky Flier has pointed out, JetBlue is building Fort Lauderdale into something much closer to a true hub. Historically, JetBlue has not been a classic connecting airline. It has been more of a point-to-point carrier with strong positions in places like New York, Boston, and Fort Lauderdale.

But Fort Lauderdale is different now and being used as a connecting point…there’s even flight banking going on.

With Spirit gone, JetBlue has a rare opportunity to become the dominant carrier at a major South Florida airport with strong leisure, visiting-friends-and-relatives, Caribbean, and Latin America traffic. That is far more interesting than trying to fight United at Newark with a scattered route map and limited scale.

With aircraft are scarce, JetBlue should put them where it can win. Newark is not where JetBlue can win. Fort Lauderdale may be.

The awkward part is that JetBlue is now in bed with United through the Blue Sky partnership.

Under that arrangement, United is returning to JFK with access to JetBlue slots, while the airlines exchange Newark timings and add reciprocal loyalty benefits. Customers will eventually be able to access many benefits across both carriers, and United customers can now earn and redeem miles on many JetBlue flights.

Officially, the airlines remain independent. They will still price and manage their own networks.

But when JetBlue cuts Newark routes where United is already strong, it naturally raises eyebrows. It may be perfectly rational network planning. But it may also be exactly what you would expect when two airlines are increasingly aligned: JetBlue focuses where it is strong, United focuses where it is strong, and the overlap diminishes…dare I say, deliberately?

That is not necessarily nefarious or a sign of collusion, but…

I have said before that I think a United – JetBlue combination remains a strong potential outcome, and these moves only reinforce that view. The JetBlue debt problem is still a problem and that may indeed make a merger insurmountable, but I’m not foreclosing the possibility.

JetBlue has a great brand, a loyal customer base, a strong New York presence, a valuable position in Boston, a growing Fort Lauderdale opportunity, and a product that many passengers genuinely prefer. But it also has a structural problem. It is too large to be a boutique carrier and too small to match the network breadth of the Big Three. It’s cost structure is too high to be a budget carrier.

That shaky middle ground is the reason why JetBlue continues to lose money.

When it comes to merger partners, American still makes the most sense to me, but it is choosing to increase collaboration with Alaska Airlines instead. Already strong in NewYork and Boston, Delta does not need JetBlue. Alaska does not appear interested as it focuses on its own growth with Hawaiian Airlines. United, meanwhile, has the clearest strategic fit.

United wants more relevance at JFK. JetBlue wants more global relevance and a stronger loyalty proposition. United has the longhaul network JetBlue lacks. JetBlue has the JFK slots and East Coast leisure network United wants. The Blue Sky partnership already gives both sides a way to test the commercial logic.

We know a merger will face serious antitrust scrutiny, especially in New York and Boston. If Democrats win the House and/or Senate in November, there would be more political noise and more hearings. But Congress does not approve airline mergers. The real action would be at Department of Justice and Department of Transportation, and the case would depend heavily on market conditions at the time. I don’t see it as a problem.

The problem is the debt, not the regulatory burdens.

The consumer angle is complicated.

On one hand, fewer JetBlue flights from Newark means less competition against United. That is not great for fares. Newark travelers lose choices, and United becomes even more dominant. It’s bad news for those who fly JetBlue out of Newark.

On the other hand, JetBlue wasting aircraft in marginal Newark flying does not help consumers if the routes are not sustainable. A stronger JetBlue in Fort Lauderdale may be better than a weaker JetBlue spread too thin across expensive airports where it cannot win.

Consumers benefit from competition, but competition has to be economically durable. JetBlue cannot be everywhere. It has to choose. Right now, it appears to be choosing Fort Lauderdale over Newark and that makes a lot of sense.

JetBlue’s Newark cuts are not surprising. Newark is United’s fortress, and JetBlue lacks the scale, revenue base, and network depth to make it work there. In the same way United could not make JFK work without meaningful scale, JetBlue cannot make Newark work by dabbling around the edges.

The bigger story is what this says about JetBlue’s future.

JetBlue is concentrating where it has a real chance to build strength, particularly Fort Lauderdale, while its partnership with United gives both airlines a closer commercial relationship in the New York market.

That may be just a partnership for now. But I still believe a United – JetBlue merger remains a plausible and even likely endgame. The politics would be messy, especially if Democrats control one or both chambers of Congress, but the strategic logic is only getting stronger.

JetBlue cannot win Newark from United just like United cannot recreate JetBlue at JFK. I don’t think there was any collusion here, but I also think we may see even more reduction in route overlap in the months to come as JetBlue at least leaves open the option for a merger with United, knowing that the more overlap, the harder regulators will push back over a merger.

United has always wanted a Southeast hub and Fort Lauderdale could be it. A deal with American Airlines was never serious (to me), but a deal with JetBlue and growth in Florida, New York, and Boston seems quite reasonable.