Gatwick Airport ci riprova: nuova proposta per la seconda pista


AZ209

Utente Registrato
24 Ottobre 2006
16,944
71
Londra.
Gatwick Airport renews push for second runway

Gatwick Airport will resurrect proposals for a second runway this summer as it ramps up efforts to become London’s main gateway to booming economies in Asia.

Details of the airport’s plans have emerged as its chief executive, Stewart Wingate, blamed rival Heathrow for giving foreign airlines a false impression that London was “closed for business”. Gatwick, which has been owned by Global Infrastructure Partners since 2009, will publish a “master plan” next month setting out what the airport will look like in eight years’ time. The airport’s bosses will also float two scenarios for how it could develop after 2020 - including the case for a two-runway airport.

In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Wingate said a second runway at Gatwick or Stansted would be less problematic - and costly - than either a new airport in the Thames Estuary or expansion at Heathrow. The costs of building “Boris Island” seemed “prohibitively expensive”, he said, while a third Heathrow runway could cost in the region of £10bn-£15bn.

More people would be affected by the noise created by an enlarged Heathrow than at Gatwick or Stansted, the former BAA director added. “There’s a noise contour which says that in and around Heathrow there’s about a quarter of a million people that live very close to that noise contour. “But the equivalent numbers for Stansted or Gatwick are broadly comparable at about 2,000-3,000 living in the same noise-impacted area.”
Gatwick is restricted from building an extra runway before 2019 but has safeguarded land for the purpose.
The debate around capacity in the south-east has intensified over the past few weeks as the industry awaits the Government’s long-delayed aviation white paper.
Tomorrow [Monday] the Aviation Foundation, an organisation founded by BAA, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and Manchester Airports Group, will set out a series of tests against which it believes government aviation policy should be measured.

However, Mr Wingate warned messages put out by BAA over a capacity crisis were, in fact, damaging London’s ability to secure more long-haul connections.
The airport boss, who previously managed BAA-owned Stansted, said many foreign airlines have the false impression London’s aviation market as a whole is “closed for business” due to an “obsession” in some parts of the industry with Heathrow.
“With the messaging from Heathrow at the moment there’s this perception that Heathrow’s full [and therefore] London’s closed,” he said.
“As far as I am concerned that is a terrible message to be giving to these people [in emerging markets] when you actually have significant capacity at Gatwick and at Stansted too.”

Gatwick carries about 34m passengers a year but estimates it will hit 45m by the middle of next decade.
“We read a lot about the hub debate and about only a hub airport can develop long-haul routes and we don’t believe that thesis,” Mr Wingate said.
A spokeswoman for BAA said: “Whilst there are point-to-point airports in London with spare capacity, only hub airports have sufficient scale for transport passengers to support network airlines. UK businesses trade 20 times as much with emerging markets with daily flights than those with less frequent or no direct service. Yet without the transfer passengers a hub provides, direct long-haul connections between the UK and many important business destinations are not viable.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...ck-Airport-renews-push-for-second-runway.html
 
Ripesco il thread per una statistica (ovvia quanto inevitabile) sulla contrarieta' dei residenti ad una seconda pista a LGW:


Gatwick residents oppose second runway

easid-278782-media-id-11146.jpg

Almost two thirds of local residents oppose a second runway at Gatwick, according to a new poll.
The three-month review of people living in Sussex, Surrey and Kent found that 61% would not support expansion of the airport with a new runway, although 36% voiced support for a second runway while 2.5% did not know.
The poll was conducted by anti-airport expansion body Communities Against Gatwick Noise and Emissions (Cagne).
It found the majority claiming that Gatwick was an inferior option over Heathrow for a new runway for the south-east of England because it is not in London and local infrastructure could not sustain expansion of the airport. Also low flying aircraft adversely impact rural areas.
Questioned about night flights, 37% would like to see a ban on night departures and 32% a ban on arrivals. A total of 36% claimed to be impacted by night noise.
Some local residents suggested expansion of Birmingham airport rather than Gatwick if the government reverses its decision on backing a third runway at Heathrow.
Birmingham would be a better option with its proposed fast rail travel links to London and northern England by HS2.


http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articles/298000/gatwick-residents-oppose-second-runway